A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

If all midair collisions were eliminated...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old February 14th 10, 08:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.soaring
Darryl Ramm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,403
Default If all midair collisions were eliminated...

On Feb 14, 11:27*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
Dave writes:
Just to throw in *.02 re your TCAS comment..................


We have the ZAON XRX on board our Cherokee in a VERY busy environment
(100,000 operations /yr)


I cannot begin to tell you how useful this tool is in tracking
trafffic around us


For $1500 !


The Sandel ST3400 is a TAWS/RMI display that also includes TCAS capability,
with a fancy back-projected LCD display. That's probably why it is so
expensive. I suppose TCAS alone is a lot cheaper.

I looked at the ZAON XRX on their Web site and it looks like a pretty
practical gadget.


The Sandel ST3400 is a display for TCAS. The Sandel does not "include
TCAS" as seems to be implied here.

TCAS I systems start at ~$20k for GA aircraft, not including displays
and other critical components, and for TCAS II in a transport category
aircraft can go to prices you can buy a nice house.

The Zaon MRX and XRX are quire different than TCAS so I'm not sure why
this thread was renamed TCAS. They are examples of PCAS (Portable/
Passive Collision Avoidance Systems) systems not TCAS, i.e. to start
with they don't actively interrogate transponders, instead relying on
listening to replies to interrogations from ground SSR, and airborne
TCAD and TCAS systems. TCAD systems (e.g. the L3 Skywatch) do active
interrogations but are less sophisticated and capable than TCAS
systems, although some of the newer high-end versions of what have
traditionally been TCAD systems are meeting TCAS I requirements. Of
all these systems only TCAS II issues a resolution advisory (RA) (i.e.
instruction to climb/descend to avoid traffic, which override ATC
clearances/instructions). PCAS, TCAD and TCAS I and II acronyms are
pretty much widely accepted (TCAS I and II have very specific
meanings), quite different in technology/capabilities are usually
worth carefully differentiating between.

To the previous post, I agree that PCAS systems are very useful low
cost ways of improving traffic awareness, and I fly with a Zaon MRX
(and transponder) in my motorglider. However as with all systems it
helps to know of their limitations. For PCAS this starts with (1.)
they can only detect Mode C or Mode S transponder equipped aircraft,
(2.) that are actively being interrogated by another source (luckily
there are usually lots of those interrogators out there).

Darryl
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mid Air Collisions Sukumar Kirloskar Soaring 2 July 3rd 08 02:42 PM
FAA Soaring Forecasts being eliminated? David Neptune Soaring 6 July 15th 06 05:47 AM
Kids and Aviation records. I thought these were supposed to be eliminated. Roger Halstead Piloting 2 September 27th 04 07:20 PM
Mid-Air Collisions JJ Sinclair Soaring 26 April 19th 04 08:52 AM
MID AIR COLLISIONS Vorsanger1 Soaring 2 April 16th 04 04:17 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.