![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken S. Tucker wrote:
On Mar 18, 10:48 pm, Dan wrote: Ken S. Tucker wrote: On Mar 18, 2:59 pm, Chris wrote: On Mar 18, 2:47 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote: The RN was pretty much useless, recall Pearl Harbor, suppose the This feels like I'm being punked, but let's go ahead and treat this as a real argument. If you are trying to say that airplanes will surely sink the RN and allow Sealion to continue because a lot of ships were sunk at Pearl Harbor, then your argument fails. The Imperial Japanese Navy attacked Pearl Harbor. They would not be involved in a Sealion invasion. What you need to understand is that the IJN was the best in the world at sinking ships at this time. The period from before Pearl Harbor through to the middle of the Guadalcanal campaign or so is their high water mark. Saying that because the Japanese in that time frame could sink a lot of ships in a few hours (especially when they are obligingly stationary in port during daylight) therefore the Germans could to (at night while steaming at 20+ knots) is like saying that because LeBron James and the Cleveland Cavaliers beat the Lakers, me and my friend's who play pick-up basketball will too (even if we give them a 15 point head start) . Let's do a quick comparison of the Luftwaffe (and this is mighty Fliegerkorps X a year later, specially trained for attacking ships- but not in September 1940) and the IJN. During the evacuation of Crete HMS Fiji and HMS Gloucester operated inside Luftwaffe air range for over two days, with no fighter support, and were only sunk when the two cruisers ran out of AA ammo. During Operation C the Kido Butai's dive bombers (the torpedo bombers held their weapons, hoping for better targets) put HMS Cornwall and HMS Dorsetshire both underwater within a half-hour of the first bomb falling. That is the level of difference we are talking about between the Japanese and the Germans: an order of magnitude in effectiveness. And then factor in the difference between hitting ships that are moving and hitting ships that are berthed in port, and I begin to suspect that you are not fully serious with this argument. Nazi's float a bunch of cheap boats, the RN responds and the Luftwaffe Were would they get these cheap boats? They didn't have enough to carry their invasion force, even by essentially ending all river traffic and causing significant economic dislocation (in particular, coal transport was seriously curtailed, meaning that steel production was way down- see Tooze, _Wages of Destruction_). Barges were critical for German economic activity, and they didn't have enough (largely because Hitler had focused on other things, allowing most of the transportation infrastructure to degrade severely- the Reichsbahn suffered quite badly too). I am leaning towards the conclusion that this argument of yours must be some sort of elaborate hoax, though I am at a loss as to the purpose. Chris Manteuffel As a hobby I build houses, cottages and track vehicles, here's pix, http://www.flickr.com/photos/dynamics/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/3515661...7616995388478/ that's for fun. Toy tanks and play houses are a far cry from combat vehicles. An army of 100,000 could easily turn out 1000 barges a day! Low skill labor, I could organize that. Use math, 30,000/month, disposable on the beach of choice. No hoax, brits would "likely" be overwhelmed. Ken Perhaps if there were production lines, no sealant or paint cure times and the like there could have been "1000 barges a day made." Where does the wood come from? Are you thinking they should have used fresh cut wood? If they are motorized where do the engines come from? Combat vehicles and aircraft had priority. If they aren't motorized how do they get across the Channel? For that matter, how long would they take to get across? The Higgins boats were far superior to anything the Nazis toyed with for beach landings. They couldn't safely cross the Channel fast enough to avoid detection and destruction. Let's assume in Tucker WorldŽ the Nazis could have amassed 30,000 barges and got them across the Channel. How many could beach at a time? Other than offloading men and man portable supplies and weaponry what can you get on the beach in rapid succession? The Nazis had no plans for Mulberry equivalents so any vehicles would have to be off loaded onto that beach. Let's see, you have men on the beach securing a beach head, a beach clogged with barges, barges off shore waiting en masse, very limited Nazi naval gun support (if any), no AAA on the beach etc. and, assuming the landing is at dawn, a bunch of collisions between the barges. I suppose an unopposed landing might succeed, but there's the rub, the locals would be able to out man the Nazis, the Nazis wouldn't be able to stop the RAF from banging them up a bit and the RN wasn't far away. I'm sure you can organize the low skilled labour. I base that on the workmanship of your playhouses. How long does it take you to remove an engine? Actually Kaiser of America built thousands of liberty ships out of Fero-concrete. Diesel Engine dropped in minutes and they sailed convoy across the Atlantic to England, Russia and later France. Cheap and very fast to build. Could build them faster then they could be sunk. Although reading their history..They were a bitch to sink. It takes me about 10 minutes, 5 if I don't take a break. I can do a 35 hp outboard myself, with no problem in about 3 minutes, including gas tank, done that as a kid. Pulling up a 50hp off a boat is pretty much my limit. So you assign a strong man to that task and send it back. Danelda, the Nazi's could mass produce V2 rockets, do ya really think mass producing 50 hp outboards motors would be a problem? So I mass produce barges, say 10'x40' from a forest (duh), and put a few 50's on it and my stuff gets to england in 5 hrs, using a compass on a foggy night, there's a lot of coast to make 'numerous' beach heads. Any RN is dead when He's, Dorniers, Me-110's equiped with Nazi torpedoes with Me-109 cover, I'll toss in some Stuka's. Nazi's torpedoes worked, and what's RN using, searchlights to locate the barges at night, they is DOA. Even a ding-bat pilot could toast a RN ship with a torpedo as soon as it lights up. If I was in command of Sea Lion, england would be conquered without doubt, fortunately your boyfriend Hitler wasn't interested, and ****ed around with england and under that cover, planned and assembled for attacking Russia. Actually Dan I think you're right about that in a previous post. That's new to me, so I appreciate that insight, Hitler doing smoke and mirrors in Battle of Britain as Stalin wrings his ugly hands in delight as Europeans fight, especially given the treaty he had Hitler sign, no attacking for 10 years, hard to trust people, as he moves to Barbarossa, almost worked. Ken |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American Women Raped in Iraq by "Lawless" Bushite Grunters - 1.The ISI's General, Mahmoud Ahmad funded 911's Atta - 2. We have video of ironflowing like water from the towers - American Women Raped in Iraq by"Lawless" Bushite | frank | Naval Aviation | 1 | August 30th 08 12:35 PM |
American Women Raped in Iraq by "Lawless" Bushite Grunters - 1. The ISI's General, Mahmoud Ahmad funded 911's Atta - 2. We have video of iron flowing like water from the towers - American Women Raped in Iraq by "Lawless" Bushi | Charlie Wolf[_2_] | Naval Aviation | 0 | August 29th 08 03:19 AM |
Corporate News Whores are Evil to All Humans Being - PentagonWon't Probe KBR [GANG] Rape Charges - "Heaven Won't Take [bushite] Marines" -American corporations actively attempt to MURDER American women, and American"Men" refus | WiseGuy | Naval Aviation | 0 | January 9th 08 02:50 PM |