![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"brian whatcott" wrote in message
... Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe wrote: "Peter Dohm" wrote in message ... With the quest for efficiency, in recent years, most of the newer tri-gear designs have featured free castering nose wheels. That has certainly reduced the aerodynamic drag of the nose wheel; Moving it to the back and reducing the size by a factor of 4 would do even more... Not to mention...even the venerable C150 disengaged the nosewheel in flight to free caster. Brian W Not the ones that I flew. On the 150 and 152 models with which I was familiar, the scissor link engaged a cam on the oleo casing when the nose strut was fully extended--which forced the nosewheel into its straight ahead position. Since the nosewheel steering force was applied through a pair of springs, the rudder operated normally with only a little more pressure; but, due to the limited nosewheel steering force which was available, tight turns on the ramp did require assistance from the brakes. Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Off-topic Q | D Ramapriya | Piloting | 17 | July 23rd 09 04:30 AM |
Off-topic, but in need of help | Alan Erskine | Aviation Photos | 20 | January 5th 07 06:21 AM |
Almost on topic... | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 22 | January 30th 06 06:55 PM |
off topic, just a little--maybe? | L.D. | Home Built | 5 | August 27th 05 04:56 PM |
off topic | Randall Robertson | Simulators | 0 | January 2nd 04 01:29 PM |