![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am dubitative of the pertinence of one’s expertise in simulation having
never experienced the genuine activity being simulated. However, we’ve explored the possibility that mitigating factors, be they medical, pecuniary or other could make this the only real option. This is fine, however to profess any sort of expertise in the matter this shortfall would have to be compensated by an even greater study of the subject. This does not appear to be the case with MX. Flight is flight. Most of the differences between simulation and the real world tend to be insignificant in the wide world of aviation. This statement is an open gate to a vast sea of ignorance. The topic of transfer of experience from simulation to real flight, the role of _realism_ and its subset of components (visual, motion, audio, cockpit resource management, I could go on and on) are the subject of a large number of published scholarly works and an even greater number of doctoral theses. All of this ongoing study is tacitly predicated on the assumption that the above statement is impertinent at best, and probably patently false. Things change from one aircraft to another. Lots and lots of things. Things also change between a sim and a real aircraft. The adaptation process is the same for both cases. Another statement that reveals a very shallow depth of inquiry and a superficial understanding of simulation, aside the fact that it is simply untrue. I do not contest the right of any enthusiast to delve into simulation to extract whatever pleasure and learning they may. It is a low-cost, zero-risk way of learning a lot about aviation and getting a lot of enjoyment out of it. This is perfectly legitimate, and I have no criticism of MX or any contributor her to put in and get out whatever they wish from these desktop simulators. There is a serious side to simulation though, and is clear that MX is not well versed in the subject. So while he is free to post his observations, based on his many hours of experience, we cannot consider his view to be that of one knowledgeable about simulation. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Simulators | Birdog | Piloting | 33 | March 9th 09 10:46 PM |
PC IFR simulators | Nick Kliewer | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | November 2nd 06 08:16 AM |
Simulators | [email protected] | Simulators | 1 | October 20th 04 09:12 PM |
IFR simulators | Tony | Owning | 8 | October 27th 03 08:42 PM |
IFR simulators | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | July 24th 03 03:53 AM |