![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris
Some of the Century Series Fighters had a RAT (Ram Air Turbine). It was mounted on a hinged door and was deployed by a handle and cable from the cockpit. It gave enough hydraulic pressure for minimal control of the A/C with loss of engine hydraulic pressure. If you connected a ventura on a hinged spring loaded door that could be extended into the slip stream when needed your problem might be solved simply and with not a lot of extra weight or drag in normal flight? You also could put a vacuum pump, that is propeller driven, on door that could be extended if and when needed. You of course need to mount door to open in a high pressure location in the slip stream. Big John On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 08:20:49 -0600, Chris W wrote: Here is why I was asking about the reverse NACA duct. I am thinking that a simple venturi would be a great backup to an engine driven pump. Naturally no one wants to add the drag that bolting a venturi tube on the side of the plane would give. So I was trying to think of a way to make it retractable. Then I started thinking about using a NACA duct and keeping the venturi inside the plane, probably in the rear fuselage. You would open a vent when you needed it and keep it closed when you didn't. So the question I have now is how to make sure there is no drag penalty when the venturi is not in use. Would it be necessary to cover both entry and exit holes or would simply shutting a valve to prevent air flow do the job? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reverse NACA duct | Chris W | Home Built | 22 | October 28th 03 10:59 PM |