A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hercules Engines



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old January 23rd 04, 02:16 AM
B2431
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: Jim Yanik
Date: 1/22/2004 5:11 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(B2431) wrote in
:

Jim Yanik wrote:

"Well,then it violates basic physics.If you have two voltage sources
of
slightly different voltages,currents DO flow between them.That's a
basic principle. And bimetal TCs are simply millivolt voltage
sources."

Just picking a nit here. All thermocouples are bimetallic by
definition so the term "bimetal thermocouple" is redundant. It's kind
of like saying "8 am in the morning."

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


Well,I note you didn't have any argument with the first part of that post.
I apologize for my redundant statement.

BTW,how many of these TCs are paralleled together in one engine?

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net

I think that depends on the engine. To be honest I no longer recall the number
as it never seemed important to me at the time.

I do know taver gets his jollies arguing and name calling. I do know the
systems I have worked on including TIT, EGT, EPR, IAS, TAS etc.

I know what it's like climbing up the exhaust pipe of an F-4E to connect the
jetcal tester to the EGT probes. I do know what a heat rise test does. I do
know when a thermocouple fails the indicator still reads since the
thermocouples are in parallel. I do know you can see each thermocouple has one
white wire and one green wire attached. The green and white colours are for
chromal-alumel systems.

Anyone who has been following what I have said in this newsgroup and who has
similar experiences can tell you I know pitot-static, engine etc instruments.

I do know if you do a google search on tarver in this and other NGs you will
find some rather outrageous statements and claims. If you confront him on these
and ask for proof you are subjected to personal and sometimes vulgar attacks
instead of independant citations that might back him up.

I choose not to debate him since he is obviously arguing for argument's sake.

BTW, I do not claim to be an expert on thermocouple systems, but I have worked
on recips and trubine engine systems.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch Paul Home Built 0 October 18th 04 10:14 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 April 5th 04 03:04 PM
Hercules Engines Tarver Engineering Home Built 0 January 19th 04 11:05 PM
Accident Statistics: Certified vs. Non-Certified Engines Ron Wanttaja Home Built 23 January 18th 04 05:36 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 July 4th 03 04:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.