![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 12, 8:18*am, T8 wrote:
On Jun 11, 10:01*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote: *FAILURE TO FOLLOW THIS REQUIREMENT TO ENTER THE GLIDER N-NUMBER FOR GLIDERID INSTEAD OF A CONTEST ID WILL RESULT IN THE DENIAL OF THE BADGE CLAIM." But it would just be so much simpler to eliminate this totally useless requirement. -T8 It would be even simpler to tell the IGC to take a hike, and tell the badge lady to quit rejecting badge and record claims over technicalities. If the IGC wants to go to the trouble of rejecting claims that the SSA has already approved, let them. I'll bet $10 that the IGC (remember, its just another big, bloated bureaucracy filled with people who don't like doing work) will never trouble itself. After all, if it is clear that the flight actually happened, and any technical difficulties with the declaration can be cleared up with a few emails, then that should do it. If the IGC *does* object to common sense, then its time to drop the IGC entirely and go our own way with badges and records. I could care less if a badge award says 'FAI' or 'SSA' - does anyone else in the U.S.? Frank |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trying for a Diamond Goal tommorow - water ballast question | Scott Alexander[_2_] | Soaring | 27 | April 29th 10 09:28 PM |
Distance to Goal Flight in Texas | ryanglover1969[_2_] | Soaring | 0 | March 10th 10 09:45 PM |
Diamond D-Jet First Flight | Montblack | Piloting | 5 | April 21st 06 04:00 PM |
Diamond Distance flight plan | 303SAM | Soaring | 6 | April 4th 06 12:21 AM |
PW-5 Diamond Goal Flights | Dick Johnson | Soaring | 2 | November 17th 03 01:44 AM |