![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
5Z wrote:
Just saw this in my inbox: http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news..._202760-1.html The Federal Communications Commission took the general aviation world by surprise when it said in a recent report ...... "Were we to permit continued marketing and use of 121.5 MHz ELTs ... it would engender the risk that aircraft owners and operators would mistakenly rely on those ELTs for the relay of distress alerts," the FCC says. AOPA said today it is opposed to the rule change. OK, maybe the satellites don't monitor the 121.5 units anymore, but haven't commercial airliners been required to monitor 121.5 at all times? I would think there are enough flight routes in the USA that almost all areas would be in range of an overflying jetliner to pick up the signal... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Use of 121.5 ELTs to be illegal in U.S. in about 60 days. | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 15 | July 3rd 10 09:23 PM |
Anybody installing tri-band (406MHz) ELTs? | Michelle P | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | July 4th 05 09:10 PM |
Anybody installing tri-band (406MHz) ELTs? | Michelle P | General Aviation | 0 | July 4th 05 09:10 PM |
406 ELTs: link featuring many models | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | February 20th 05 09:36 PM |
Airshows should be banned...Now! | Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast | Military Aviation | 28 | June 15th 04 02:43 AM |