A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

5" PNA & APIC



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3  
Old June 30th 10, 07:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Martin Gregorie[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,224
Default 5" PNA & APIC

On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:15:25 -0700, jb92563 wrote:

LK8000 is free and I believe you can load/attach auxilliary info for
airfields, although I have personally not tried that yet.

The existing airfield information includes coordinates, airspace
frequencies, runway numbers and occasionally comments so I dont find the
need to see an airport map since I dont fly in to anything more complex
that Class D airspace.

XCSoar and LK8000 currently use the same method of handling airfield
information. You create an airfield.txt file that contains textual
information about one or more airfields, each preceded with the airfield
name in square brackets on a separate line, i.e. "[AIRFIELD]", which must
be an exact match on the name of a turnpoint in one of the turnpoint
files - preferably a TP carrying an 'airfield' or 'landable' annotation.

Tapping the airfield on the display brings up a scrollable page of
information about it.

Its worthwhile setting up an airfields file containing your home field,
even it its the only entry, and marking it as your home field. Here's
what mine looks like:

[GRL GrnsdnLd=HOME]
Gransden Lodge

because the program tends to default to it if there's no current task.

It would take some work however to gather the extra airport info and
load it up yourself if you wanted more details ....ie setup....

Yep - as always, the problem is getting hold of the airfield information
in a suitable, machine-readable form.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"VideO Madness" ( Soldiers...) "GoD Hates FAGS!!! (He sO righteOusly DoES)" Colonel Jake Naval Aviation 0 March 1st 10 12:14 AM
Phrase "landing runway" vs. "cleared to land" Robert M. Gary Piloting 168 February 5th 08 05:32 PM
Old polish aircraft TS-8 "Bies" ("Bogy") - for sale >pk Aviation Marketplace 0 October 16th 06 07:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.