![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 5, 5:33*am, Papa3 wrote:
On Jul 4, 10:06*pm, Nine Bravo Ground wrote: Overall, you need to set your cruise based on McCready for your expected ACTUAL climb rate, including centering time and other considerations such as changes in climb rate at the top or bottom of the climb (Cochrane explains this pretty well in his papers) - different pilots estimate this in different ways, some computers give bottom-to-top averages as well. *The net effect is slower climb rates than you might otherwise estimate based on staring at you 30-second averager. 9B Just a quick note on this point. *I've been informally checking with pilots for several years after flights on our local DIY contest here to calibrate the actual conditions against my weather forecasts. Often times, I'll hear that it was a "great day - I was hitting 5-6kts". * Post flight analysis of several traces reveal that achieved climbs were more like 3-4kts at best. *It's very clear that we don't do a great job of accounting for our centering losses and hanging in for too long once the lift tails off. By the way, * in the good old days before flight recorders, it seems that lift was a lot stronger. Maybe it's weight of the FRs that's slowing things down :-) I think I know where most of the weight changes in my ship have come from... This has been discussed before, but bears mentioning in this context: It is not really worth spending much attention on the speed director of your vario/computer. It takes a fair amount of attention that is far better spent on race strategy and tactics. This applies both to setting the McCready for general speed to fly and chasing the speed director for localized lift/sink. I tend to fly three speeds - 80-85 knots for "normal" conditions, 90-95 knots if it is super strong and consistent with clouds and streeting and 70-75 knots if it is weak, I need a long glide or I am low (this is all dry - add 5-10 knots for water). This is pretty consistent for most racing pilots I know. Best L/D for my ship is 60 knots so there is no point in ever flying less than 70 (McCready 1). There just isn't that much difference in glide angle (L/D of 45 instead of 47 on the factory polar) so slowing down by the additional 15% is just giving speed away. Similarly, the knee in the polar is somewhere around 85 knots, so it has to be really strong to motivate me give away altitude at a higher rate. 9B |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"VideO Madness" ( Soldiers...) "GoD Hates FAGS!!! (He sO righteOusly DoES)" | Colonel Jake | Naval Aviation | 0 | March 1st 10 12:14 AM |
"Imagine the impossible and do it." Dr. Paul MacCready Dies In His Sleep August 28, 2007 | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 1 | August 31st 07 07:54 PM |
"Imagine the impossible and do it." Dr. Paul MacCready Dies In His Sleep August 28, 2007 | Larry Dighera | Soaring | 1 | August 31st 07 07:54 PM |