![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 17, 9:17*am, "vaughn" wrote:
"Mike Adams" wrote in message .. . If you have your own physical and it finds *something, you're obligated to report it on the FAA medical application form. This is a classic case of unintended consequences from a perfectly reasonable-sounding governmental regulation. *The requirement for medical certification may actually make pilots, especially Commercial pilots, LESS healthy because any visit to their private physician has the potential to ground them and forever remove their livelihood. *It is hard to think of any other group of workers with that type of potential bombshell hanging over their head. Vaughn I had a conversation about a related subject yesterday. This had to do with recruiting healthy subjects in the 40 to 60 year old range for a clinical trial. The principal investigator mentioned that about 1 in 8 of those who self reported themselves as 'healthy' failed to meet the screening criteria and were referred to their primary care physician or a cardiologist. This 'unintended experiment' more or less led me to conclude most of us with class 2 or 3 physicals may only see an MD for a regular check up as part of of flight physical, and that is probably the first time many of us learn of an underlying problem. The obvious exception of course would be eye examinations. Some health problems are preventable -- there are better reasons than a desire to fly as PIC to stay fit, but no matter what the reason, just do it! (Full disclosure, I own Nike stock.) I do agree some small number when learning of a problem from someone other than a flight surgeon will try to hide it. If the uncovered disease is cardio pulmonary messing around in airplanes around 10,000 feet without supplementary O2 is not smart and it would be a good idea for a prudent pilot to know that. For what it's worth I have no such problems, but have been persuaded O2 and a bottle of 5 Hour Energy is a good way to stay safe at 10,000 feet at night. (Hey guys, Five Hour Energy has a lot less fluid than a thermos of high octane coffee, and that makes the need for urinating into a ziplock bag on a long XC less likely -- more than you wanted to know, huh?). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question on the medical... | Richard | Piloting | 25 | March 29th 06 04:41 PM |
Yet another medical question | Rachel | Piloting | 13 | February 5th 06 10:44 PM |
Medical question | Michael | Piloting | 10 | December 7th 05 06:58 PM |
FAA medical question | G. Sylvester | Piloting | 17 | March 12th 05 11:13 AM |
Question Medical | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 5 | June 11th 04 05:12 AM |