![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Derek
You are correct - I am amplifying the difference. As I said I actually prefer the handling on the Cirrus. BUT - I learned, on the Cirrus, to fly with a very light touch on the stick. There is virtually no force feedback on pitch. Especially in some of the big rough thermals we get here, you tend to get a wing dropping quite easily. As Bob commented - it is a pilot skill thing. I can, and do, fly the Cirrus quite close to the limit and get the best climb rates etc. When I do that I am aware that the departure from controlled flight is quite rapid - and if I am not paying attention I will have a wing drop. Recovery is instant - just unload the wing. Smoothly approached there is a distinct turbulent warning - especially as the wake hits the elevator. So - the Cirrus is a precise aircraft to fly, but can be more work than some others. e.g. you can't take your hand off the stick for more than a second or so (Phugoid is divergent and the elevator is effectively mounted on a gimbal), and will reliably reward ham fisted insensitive control inputs with a spin. The point I was trying to make is that some aircraft require more attention. Which can contribute to impaired capability - which is less safe. For what it is worth. I have serial Std Cirrus number 57. Which is a little different - it was imported by the Schempp agent specifically for the purpose of flying records. So - It has lower washout on the tips, (standard on early models) - the components (wings/fuselage etc) were selected at the factory for being heavy. - It has a tail wheel and is set up with the CG quite far aft. I have to accept that as the heavy fuselage limits the amount of weight I can put in the nose without exceeding max non-lifting weight with me in it. - Said heroic early owners damaged both wingtips, and broke the fuselage (twice) and elevator - so lots of repairs at various stages. Maybe she is not 100% straight. - Currently in the workshop getting the second paddles added to the airbrakes and winglets to improve the low speed behaviour, and a cosmetic make over to make her pretty again. Bruce --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Please ID 3 sailplanes | Every time | Soaring | 4 | August 20th 08 09:34 PM |
don't try to prepare potentially while you're forgiving with a rough string | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | August 13th 07 04:01 AM |
Repost from Feb. 2002: " forgiving training heli" by Bob Barbanes | [email protected] | Rotorcraft | 2 | January 30th 06 08:23 PM |
New Products for Sailplanes. | [email protected] | Soaring | 6 | July 4th 05 09:27 AM |
50+:1 15m sailplanes | Paul T | Soaring | 92 | January 19th 04 01:59 AM |