![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 6, 5:19*am, tommytoyz wrote:
*If Stefano Ghiorzo wins a two week contest in the Diana, then he probably had won in an ASG-29, too. I do not agree. Stefano is leading by just 2.3% over # 2 Leigh Wells in an ASG29. I'm sure that the Diana-2 advantage over the contest has been much more than just 2.3%. If he had been flying an ASG29, I am convinced he would not be leading as the ASG29 suffers much more than 2.3% against the Diana-2. Cockpit size may be a factor in the USA, but in the rest of the world, most people are still reasonably sized. I agree on that. Americans are over sized and need to consider that more than anyone else. However, the American market is small compared to the rest of the world anyway. It would be interesting to study physical fitness Vs. placing at a World soaring contest. I can not remember grossly overweight pilots ever placing in the top 3. I think there is a correlation and cause and effect there. Sorry but I think true. Reichman wrote is his book that fitness is a very important element of success in competition soaring. I suggest you buy one and come out and kick our butts with the overwhelming performance advantage. But- don't crash it. Perspective- I had a long exchange with Gerhard Waibel when he was doing the ASW-28. I wanted a smaller wing with higher aspect ratio. He went slightly the other way. His practical explanation was that he wasn't designing the product only for me as a racer, but that it had to work for many users and be usable in a club environment in order to be a viable product. It could also not compromise the level of safety established. I have 2 gliders in my shop now where the pilots likely would have been seriuosly injured if the gliders they flew did not have this important attribute. This is not possible without some additional structural weight. It also must be repairable using techniques available in existing repair shops. The JS1 guys paid a lot of attention to this important point. Owner needs to be confident he will be able to get parts and support. Buying my next racing glider depends on being able to sell the one I have now. I doubt there are more than a handful of folks that compete that aren't in the same situation. The Dianna 2 is a remarkable machine, but my personal evaluation was, and is, that it does not measure up to other options in the areas other than performance. FWIW UH |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NPR discussion on NAS | Neil Gould | Piloting | 9 | September 3rd 07 09:47 PM |
Good ILS discussion | NoneYa | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | August 18th 07 08:12 PM |
Rules for the OLC (Discussion) | Hans L. Trautenberg | Soaring | 4 | August 18th 04 10:36 PM |
Complex / High Performance / Low Performance | R.T. | Owning | 22 | July 6th 04 08:04 AM |
Following the Eye Candy Discussion | Quilljar | Simulators | 2 | March 8th 04 12:40 AM |