![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Spiv" wrote in message ... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "Eunometic" wrote in message om... With a modified Fueselage it of course became a great maritime patrol aircraft known as the Nimrod. Nimrod is apparently superior than the Orion: at least as far as the airframe is concerned. Please xplain your reasons for arriving at this conclusion. While the Nimrod is a fine aircraft the P-3 has had rather more export success. Our master of logic enters the fray. The VC10 and Super VC10 was a superior plane to the 707, yet the 707 outsold it. It was far from superior which is why harly anybody except BA bought the thing and they only did so because the government made them. There was a famous leaked memo from BOAC requesting a subsidy because they were having to compete with 707's that were cheaper to run Not only were the initial operating costs of the VC-10 higher but the buried engine design meant that it couldnt use the new more efficient (and quieter) powerplants that the 707 and DC-8 were requipped with which meant the aircraft became increasingly uncompetitve and it could not meet the new noise restrictions introduced in the 70's and 80's. The burried engines ( speys and now BMW/Rolls Royce BR715 ) provide a significantly reduced radar signature. (Here lies the disadvantage of burried eingines: installing high bypass ratio engines required re-engineering of the wing roots) I seriously doubt that any real advantage accrues from this. Nimrod has a LARGE radar signature. The engines which are close to the fueselage mean that opperation with engines shutdown does not create significant asymetric thrust problems. Indeed opperation on 2 engines is I believe normal on long loitering patrols. The latest Nimrods I believe have a range in excess of 6500nm and can launch cruise missiles. They can be armed with sidewinders and presumably AMRAAM style self homing missiles is a possibility. AMRAAM is highly unlikley He is gussing now. No and I'm not guessing either, AMRAAM requires rather more in the way of system integration than AIM-9 including a suitable aircraft radar fit to get a lock at BVR With the correct systems and sighting they might even provide the RAF with a mini B52. The big wings must provide good altitude performance. Thats just silly. Nimrod simly doesnt have the payload carrying capacity. The RAF used to have a mini B-52 , it was called the Vulcan You must read what was written. I didnt, it was full of errors Keith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lost comms after radar vector | Mike Ciholas | Instrument Flight Rules | 119 | January 31st 04 11:39 PM |
All Vietnam Veterans Were Awarded The Vietnam Cross of Gallantry | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 1st 03 12:07 AM |
Vietnam, any US planes lost in China ? | Mike | Military Aviation | 7 | November 4th 03 11:44 PM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |
Attorney honored for heroism during the Vietnam War | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 6 | August 14th 03 11:59 PM |