![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
D Ramapriya writes:
Any pilot would tell you that humans are incapable of matching computers' sophistication in precision flying. Why else would most airline SOPs actually bar pilots from hand-flying above 1,000 feet? Above 1000 feet? Did you miss a zero there? I know that RVSM requires autopilot and some airlines have policies that require autopilot for normal operations under certain conditions, but requiring that autopilot be used above 1000 feet is hard to believe. Which airlines require this, and why? I still can't believe the ultra-sophisticated Airbuses allow rudders to move so much that the empennage can actually sever from the rest of the fuselage. As omissions go, that must take the biscuit! Having been the victim of French engineering on multiple occasions in the past, I have no trouble believing that French engineers overlooked this. Their objective is not to maximize safety, but to show the world how clever they are (a rather tall order, given that they aren't actually very clever). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
To blow or not to blow... | Dallas | Piloting | 50 | February 15th 08 12:57 PM |
Another blow for Airbus | AJ | Piloting | 1 | December 9th 06 08:35 PM |
oil blow out IO-360 | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 18 | July 17th 06 04:44 PM |
oil blow out IO-360 | Robert M. Gary | Owning | 18 | July 17th 06 04:44 PM |
Blow-Proofs | jls | Home Built | 0 | June 2nd 04 05:02 AM |