![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2010-08-20, brian whatcott wrote:
At least one type suspends the aircraft tail down when the chute is deployed. This is probably the optimum energy absorbing method, with abvious benefits in crushing the tail first, and keeping a high wing from dropping into the cabin. The disadvantage is the possibility of whiplash on the neck. Brian W I get having that distance from the tail to crush, like a crumple zone, but wouldn't that add some significant dangers, such as: If the plane is 20' long, and only crushes 5', wont you then be ~15' in the air when it tips, w/o the benefit of the parachute? Also, landing on the tail, wont you also have the engine, which is most of the airplane weight, still above you? That's a lot of potential energy that could cause it to collapse more, and put an engine in your lap. I'm still relatively new - 15hr Student Pilot, so there may be some things I'm overlooking; but those things sorta jumped out at me as potential additional hazards. Regards, Scott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FAA falling further into chaos | TheTruth[_2_] | Piloting | 2 | March 12th 08 06:05 AM |
Batavia Air 737 loses wing segment in flight | BernieFlyer[_2_] | Piloting | 2 | November 25th 07 10:05 AM |
FAA Chaos | MyCoxaFallen | Piloting | 12 | June 6th 05 04:54 PM |
DC Chaos, 9/11 and other assorted FAA diasters | MyCoxaFallen | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | June 2nd 05 06:23 PM |