![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 7, 2:58*pm, Mike the Strike wrote:
On Sep 7, 11:28*am, "Larry Goddard" wrote: "Andy" wrote in message : On Sep 7, 10:22*am, "kirk.stant" wrote: A question for you racing rules makers out the Does the closed airspace rule (loss of all points plus 100 pt penalty) apply if, following a task abort on course (with enough distance on task to score for the day), a pilot then overflies class C airspace (legally, and in contact with approach, etc), enroute to a safe recovery back at the home base? I really don't understand why US has to have a different set of contest rules from the rest of the world. The FAI rules seem far more sensible when it comes to handling airspace. Andy OTOH, I don't know why the FAI has to use a different set of contest rules from the US... *But that's just me I guess... Larry "01" USA The CD and scorer's interpretation of the rules was that if a contestant had taken a legal start and flown on course, the whole flight must be conducted under contest rules, even after you have abandoned the task. I agree with Kirk, flying legally above closed airspace should not be penalized after the task is abandoned. Mike For any flight for which you must turn in a log (i.e. any launch taken from the contest site after grid time and before the day is canceled) you may not enter closed airspace. You can violate closed airspace and incur the penalty whether you start or not and whether the day is canceled or not. The SSA rationale is simple - great emphasis is placed on avoiding any (even inadvertent) B, C, P, R violations within the context of a sanctioned SSA contest. Although this was implemented before I was elected to the Rules Committee, I understand that the thinking was to avoid drawing FAA actions as a result of SSA sanctioned activities. Others before me can provide additional background. Another consideration here is that scorers already have enough work to do without arbitrating "was the task clearly abandoned and when." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fed: Planes flying in "commercial" airspace must get GPS | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 66 | June 4th 10 12:54 PM |
(USA) US/Mexico "airspace" (boundary) files available | Tuno | Soaring | 4 | March 27th 10 07:17 PM |
On Sharing airspace with "non-rated UAV "pilots" | vaughn | Piloting | 15 | March 15th 09 04:08 PM |
"Fly Baby, you violated Class B Airspace" | Ron Wanttaja | Piloting | 27 | September 5th 07 08:30 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Connecticut To Get "Creamed" By Airspace Redesign Change? | Free Speaker | General Aviation | 0 | August 8th 06 02:42 PM |