|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
September 8th 10, 02:58 PM
posted to rec.aviation.soaring
|
|||
|
|||
Racing airspace "violation" question
On Sep 7, 7:29*pm, Andy wrote:
The stupidity of the situation is that 66 would be 100 points better off if he had a logger failure than if he announced his intention to abandon the task, made a completely legal class C overflight, *and then turned in his log. I have to correct that - the score would have been the same since failure to turn in a log would get zero for the day and the additional 100 point penalty. Andy 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fed: Planes flying in "commercial" airspace must get GPS | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 66 | June 4th 10 12:54 PM |
| (USA) US/Mexico "airspace" (boundary) files available | Tuno | Soaring | 4 | March 27th 10 07:17 PM |
| On Sharing airspace with "non-rated UAV "pilots" | vaughn | Piloting | 15 | March 15th 09 04:08 PM |
| "Fly Baby, you violated Class B Airspace" | Ron Wanttaja | Piloting | 27 | September 5th 07 08:30 PM |
| Aviation Conspiracy: Connecticut To Get "Creamed" By Airspace Redesign Change? | Free Speaker | General Aviation | 0 | August 8th 06 02:42 PM |
Threaded Mode