![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 18, 11:50*am, "kirk.stant" wrote:
On Sep 18, 3:04*am, " wrote: A 2-33 should be landed just like any other "nose dragger glider" (G-103 II or ASK 21 etc) Really? *The correct landing procedure for a 2-33 (and Blanik) is a recipe for high energy landings in K-21s or G-103s (or worse case, a high sink rate bounced landing leading to the infamous "galloping Grob"!). *I hope you have a long runway and a big budget for brake pads! Some older gliders (and not all nose draggers) require a flown on landing - tail low, but on the main wheel - due to the tail wheel not being stressed for landing forces. *Examples are the 2-33 and Blanik (note, one is a nose dragger, one a tail dragger). *This is similar in concept to a wheel landing in a taildragger airplane - or a somewhat flat normal landing in a tricycle-geared airplane. *The trick is that once you have established the pitch attitude for touchdown, you can't continue to increase the angle of attack to slow down or you will touch the weak tail wheel/skid too early, so some judgement and skill is required. The later generation of trainers, whether nose draggers (k-21, g-103) or tail draggers (DG-500/1000, Duo) are designed to land main and tail at the same time - minimum energy landings - the equivalent of a 3- point landing in a taildragger airplane. *This is also the way almost all current single seat gliders are designed to be landed, for obvious reasons - gliders are now heavier and land faster, and need to be landed at the slowest possible speed in an off-field landing. That is one of the reasons the 2-33 is a poor trainer for today's glider pilots (assuming they intend to move on to something more interesting than a 1-26). *If all training is done in a 2-33 (or Blanik, to be fair), then a careful checkout in a modern glider is essential to properly prepare the transitioning pilot for the landing characteristics of most modern gliders. Just to keep this discussion interesting, we can now argue whether a low energy tailwheel-first landing is OK or bad for a modern glider (assuming a reasonable sink rate at touchdown)... Kirk Having flown a number of different gliders and power planes over the years, no two of them handle or land the same, different aircraft take different methods of landing, what works for a Cessna 150 may not do so well in a Bonanza, or what works in a 2-33 wont wor'k well in a Blanik,Lark,ASK21, etc. Thats why we have instructors to work us throught the transistion. Orvile and Willber were the only guys who had a valid reson to teach themselves to fly.. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Club Class Gliders | Sam Giltner[_1_] | Soaring | 4 | December 3rd 08 03:28 AM |
Basic Training Gliders | Derek Copeland | Soaring | 35 | December 26th 05 02:19 PM |
Basic Training Gliders | Justin Craig | Soaring | 0 | December 6th 05 10:07 PM |
Basic Training Gliders | Justin Craig | Soaring | 0 | December 6th 05 10:07 PM |
Soaring club close to NYC, with high-performance gliders | City Dweller | Soaring | 9 | September 29th 05 11:55 AM |