![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:49:29 -0500, "Canuck"
It was interesting to watch the arriving aircraft. Most every other type did not kick up that much smoke. However, ALL of the 737s did. Even a similarly sized Embraer managed to pull off a nice touchdown with barely a puff of smoke. N. From what I can see, the WJ B737s are not using landing flap settings. Speaking with 20 years service on B737-200s, we initially used 40deg of flaps (full) for landing; then when the fuel crunch came, we used 30deg as the normal setting. The WJ 737s do not appear to have that much flap extended. The reasoning behind reducing to 30deg was less drag, less fuel required to overcome the drag, thus less noise. Using even less flap will require even less power, but the speed will be higher, and touchdown will be "firmer", producing the tire smoke. Any WestJetters out there? Ken |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tears in the eyes, - 1 attachment | RobG | Aviation Photos | 4 | June 17th 08 10:51 AM |
Flying on Christmas Eve? Keep your eyes outside | Arnold Sten | Piloting | 0 | December 24th 07 01:03 PM |
owl with no eyes? | bagmaker | Soaring | 27 | October 26th 06 07:10 PM |
owl with no eyes? | Steve Leonard | Soaring | 0 | October 22nd 06 01:43 AM |
J4...for your eyes ONLY..... | TomnKeyLargo | Soaring | 0 | October 13th 03 06:42 PM |