![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm thinkin this is one of those threads that belong in
"alt.conspiracies", I guess all the worlds leaders and intel communities all got together (including the UN) and adopted resolution 1441, along with countless other resolutions. (I know you have slept a few times since then, but it wasn't that long ago, and you have to at least try to remember) and conspired that Saddam had WMD's. Then when our pres. finally does something about it, instead of just idle threats, all he gets is backlash. LOL, I really enjoyed the one reponse from George Z. Bush where he snipped the comments from prominent Democrats like Clinton, Kerry, Levin, etc., and calls them "irrelevant", hahaha. Typical. It's simply called "Monday Morning Quarterbacking". On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 11:18:22 -0500, "Kevin Brooks" wrote: "George Z. Bush" wrote in message ... JD wrote: The media and most democrats charge President Bush lied to the American people and led us into a war over oil. Even if you disregard GWB 1 and the war re Kuwait, in any attempt to be fair, you have to take these quotes into consideration: (Irrelevant quotes deleted) Among those "irrelevant" quotesd were a number of statements predating the GWB Presidency asserting that Iraq was continuing to develop, and/or had stockpiled, WMD's, from prominent Democrats like Clinton, Kerry, Levin, etc. Odd how some folks want to hang Bush for making similar statements, but are all too willing to completely ignore the earlier comments from the other side of the aisle, isn't it? Now who's lying? If we are to believe our President, clearly the intelligence community that provided our legislators with misleading and inaccurate data either were lying or were grossly imcompetent, and he should have fired them as soon as he made that determination. But then you'd have to toss in the majority of the intel services around the globe, as it appears most thought the Iraqis did indeed have hidden stocks of WMD, and/or violations of UN Res 687 (which indeed was the case). Were they all "grossly incompetent"? To my knowledge, he has not yet addressed that problem. Gee, you never held that same failure to address any intel failure against Mr. Clinton, who bought into the same story. Why the double standard? Brooks George Z. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|