![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Z. Bush" wrote in message ... "Ed Rasimus" wrote in message ... On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 19:26:19 -0500, "George Z. Bush" wrote: He was current in a "combat aircraft in use in Viet Nam". The F-102 (including ANG crews) was deployed at Udorn, Danang and Tan Son Nhut among other place. Your memory is apparently failing. See Juvat's comments elsewhere on this subject. Fact--the F-102 was deployed to the SEA theater during the time GWB volunteered for Palace Alert duty; the last F-102's apparently did not pull out of Thailand/Vietnam until the latter part of 1970. If I was an F-102 pilot who was hot to trot, I think I might have volunteered to transition into one of the birds actively used in the shooting war, like the F-105, or whatever equipment they were then using for top covers. "Top covers"?? What the hell are they? Do you mean MiGCAP? Not a specialized mission for most of the war, usually flown by F-4s. Primary job was ground attack, not traditional "fighter" against "fighter" stuff. Whatever! I obviously did not fly in VN and am not familiar with the terms used there. "Top cover" was a term used in WWII and Korea, son. ......F-102s were deployed for airbase defense intercept duty throughout the war. Not according to Juvat. They were deployed for that role during the timeframe that Bush volunteered for the mission (late '69, early '70). Juvat prefers to dally with verbal specifics (he is correct in stating that the F-102 was withdrawn before the final US pullout, but that does not matter a whit in regards to the issue of Bush volunteering for what was then a still-ongoing F-102 mission to SEA). Remember, Bush was ANG, not active force, hence he would have needed to move out of state and establish residence to find a unit with one of those aircraft types, which would probably not have gotten him deployed anyway. Your whole postulate is a non-starter here. So, follow the thread, contribute relevantly, get your facts straight, and reduce the level of your personal agenda. Would you care to comment on his submission of a "volunteer for o/s duty" statement when he knew or should have known that he had insufficient flying time in the bird to be favorably considered? All he had to do was to ask around, and he'd have learned that they wanted people with more hours than he had. Excuse me if I conclude that he was just going through the motions but I can't think of any other reason for volunteering for something you know you're not going to get. Volunteering means a requirement exists and if your volunteer statement is accepted, you are eligible. His wasn't, so he wasn't eligible. So what's your point? Why do you say he was not eligable? Do you think the USAF asked for volunteers from a pool of individuals who were already determijned not to be qualified for that mission? Your lack of logic is astounding. .....There might have been a "desired" hours requirement, but it was a long way from "hard and fast" if you were current in the system. So what? Are we now going to criticize the people who turned him down? I made a point that was critical of him and you're intent on making excuses for his behavior. Until you can show me something different (and I know you can't), I've concluded that he put in his volunteer statement knowing full well when he did it that it wouldn't be approved, and that he did it for self-aggrandizing purposes. You are wrong. I flew my first F-105 combat to NVN, right out of training with less than 120 hours after undergraduate pilot training. I flew my first F-4 combat, again to NVN with less than 30 hours in the F-4C (the combat was in the F-4E). I don't think lack of hours was any sort of protection from deployment. Perhaps not. I've read somewhere that he, even with his 300 hours more or less, was not the brightest candle on the F-102 cake. IAC, as I'm sure you know and will agree, there are pilots and there are pilots, and they sure as hell aren't one just like the other. For all I know, you could have taken up an F-102 with 15 or 20 hours under your belt and done a better job with the bird than he could with 500. It's possible. And meaningless. So you are now critiquing hia lleged skills as an F-102 pilot, huh? Getting desperate, Georgie? Brooks George Z. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" Smithsonian Institution Press ISBN #1-58834-103-8 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Pilot Error? Is it Mr. Damron? | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 3 | June 23rd 04 04:05 PM |
definition of "dual controls" | Lee Elson | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | April 24th 04 02:58 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation | Gilan | Home Built | 17 | September 24th 03 06:11 AM |