![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
After having been excoriated for saying that civil designs such as
those envisioned for the MC2A and ACS have no business over the battlefield, this article gives me a bit of gratification: USAF Plans Serious Look At Replacing Special Ops Aircraft By Marc Selinger February 6, 2004 The U.S. Air Force plans to start taking a serious look at potential replacements for several C-130 variants used by its special operations forces, a service representative said Feb. 5. Maj. Gen. John Dorris said the Bush Administration's fiscal 2005 budget request, submitted to Congress Feb. 2, contains "seed money" to develop concepts for an "MX" aircraft, which would replace the MC-130E/H airdrop/transport aircraft, and an "AX" which would replace the AC-130 gunship. The analysis could take about two years. With surface-to-air threats becoming increasingly sophisticated, the Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) believes it will need to begin fielding the new aircraft in about 2015 as a replacement for its aging Lockheed Martin C-130 variants, Dorris said. He spoke to reporters after speaking at a special operations conference sponsored by the National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA). "After 2015, the ability of the C-130 as it's currently configured, even with enhancements, is not going to be able to go into a lot of the airspace that it needs to go into," he said. The MX is envisioned as a long-range aircraft that is "able to do the mission in one period of darkness," Dorris said. The latest thinking for the AX is that it would be a "mothership that sends out sensors." The sensors would then report back to the mothership, which would send out "lethal and/or non-lethal projectiles," possibly small, guided missiles. A new aerial refueling capability will also be needed by AFSOC but probably later than 2015, Dorris said. To address AFSOC's tanker shortfall in the interim, about 27 MC-130H Combat Talon IIs are being modified to be capable of refueling. That work will be completed by about 2007. AFSOC's MC-130E Combat Talon Is already can perform the tanker mission. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Magneto/comm interference on TKM MX-R Narco 120 replacement | Eugene Wendland | Home Built | 5 | January 13th 04 02:17 PM |
Canada to order replacement for the Sea King | Ed Majden | Military Aviation | 3 | December 18th 03 07:02 PM |
Replacement for C130? | John Penta | Military Aviation | 24 | September 29th 03 07:11 PM |
Narco MK 16 replacement | SoulReaver714 | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | September 23rd 03 04:38 PM |
Hellfire Replacement | Eric Moore | Military Aviation | 6 | July 2nd 03 02:22 AM |