![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 03:18 17 November 2010, Paul Remde wrote:
Well done. Paul Remde "John Godfrey (QT)" wrote in message ... The USA Rules Committee has published a document detailing the decisions taken and background relating to Flarm usage in 2011 USA contests. The document can be accessed via the link below: http://www.ssa.org/files/member/2011FlarmUSA.pdf For the committee, John Godfrey (QT) USA Rules Committee While I am not directly concerned as I am a competition director in the UK I am concerned with one aspect of FLARM in competitions; 4. Stealth or other restrictions. We are not imposing stealth or other restrictions at this time. We may impose restrictions later, and may do so on a contest by contest basis. Current UK rules do require stealth restrictions during competitions and as a director I am uncomfortable with this on two main grounds. The first is that the use of STEALTH mode degrades the performance of an instrument which is designed to enhance flight safety. While it is fine for an individual pilot to make a decision to do that I am extremely uncomfortable with requiring someone to degrade a unit and therefore safety. I am pretty sure that even a British court would take a very dim view of that were there to be an accident. Whether a court would find me personally liable I have no way of knowing and given the only way of finding out I prefer to remain ignorant. The other concern is that the requirement is un-enforcable. FLARM is an open technology and while it is possible to check an instrument installed in the glider it is not possible to check and undeclared FLARM unit carried by the pilot, searching pilots before they get into their glider is not likely to ever be acceptable. It is comparatively easy to have a non--stealth unit available. A rule that cannot be enforced should never be made. Personally I prefer the route you have taken at the moment, accept that those with FLARM may receive an advantage from it's use. This alone may encourage pilots to fit FLARM and if everyone has it the playing field is at least level. In my opinion it would be unwise, given the nature of your courts, to mandate the use of stealth mode. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OLC 2011 | dhaluza | Soaring | 12 | October 22nd 10 12:02 AM |
OLC Scoring for 2011 | robert hunter | Soaring | 23 | October 21st 10 11:34 PM |
OLC Scoring for 2011 | Mike the Strike | Soaring | 9 | October 17th 10 03:41 AM |
2011 15M Nationals | Andy[_10_] | Soaring | 10 | August 19th 10 05:23 PM |
2011 USA 18M Nationals | 5 ugly | Soaring | 3 | August 18th 10 04:52 AM |