A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

PowerFlarm rentals



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #18  
Old November 22nd 10, 05:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,939
Default PowerFlarm rentals

On 11/21/2010 8:56 PM, Brad wrote:
On Nov 21, 7:57 pm, Eric wrote:



If the economics are so compelling, the insurance companies ought to
be the ones pushing for it. What says Costello?


I'd like to hear an insurance company comment on it, but I suspect an
insurance company may not benefit from something like Flarm. One simple
case: all pilots equip with Flarm, company A's insurance payouts go
down, their competitors offer policies at lower premiums that company A
has to match to keep the customers, and ta-da! their profits are back to
pre-Flarm levels. So, no financial benefit to the insurance company.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to
email me)
- "Transponders in Sailplanes - Feb/2010" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarmhttp://tinyurl.com/yb3xywl


that, Eric............in a nutshell is why insurance company are
bloodsucking parasites.


That's way too harsh - Costello has served us well for decades; besides,
I didn't say or imply they wouldn't or didn't want to do something like
that, only suggesting a reason why the economics might not be compelling
to them. I believe they are concerned about our safety.

It's not like smoking, where policy holders that didn't smoke did reduce
the companies payouts, so it was worth enticing those individuals with
reduced premiums. One pilot buying a Flarm, or using it in low risk
areas won't affect his risk, and the very small numbers of pilots and
fatalities (compared to smoking) make it an actuarial nightmare. The
economics are not their fault.

But, if we do reduce the collisions and fatalities with Flarm or other
methods, it should make future premiums lower than they otherwise would
be. But that's really a small part of the benefit of reduced collisions,
given the current low cost of liability insurance. It's the "staying
alive" thing that is our payoff, personally and for the sport.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to
email me)
- "Transponders in Sailplanes - Feb/2010" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarm
http://tinyurl.com/yb3xywl
- "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation Mar/2004" Much of what
you need to know tinyurl.com/yfs7tnz
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
K6 Mux and PowerFLARM example systems Paul Remde Soaring 0 November 15th 10 05:01 AM
PowerFLARM questions Greg Arnold[_2_] Soaring 21 November 10th 10 04:05 AM
PowerFLARM Paul Remde Soaring 9 November 6th 10 04:30 AM
PowerFLARM Greg Arnold[_2_] Soaring 6 November 2nd 10 09:32 AM
Build your own PowerFLARM! Darryl Ramm Soaring 51 August 19th 10 06:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.