![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What's the point? It's still not going to handle all that well,perhaps
worse with the extra speed. How much do you know about how the F-104 "handled"? Got any personal experience? I do...and I think your statement is typical of the ill-educated BS associated with this aircraft. "Jim Yanik" wrote in message .. . "Bjørnar Bolsøy" wrote in : http://www.f-16.net/reference/versions/f16_79.html I've read that the F-104's speed is really limited by the compressor inlet temperature on the J79, and that the airframe itself supports much higher speeds. Since the J79 fits (modified) in a F-16, what then if we were to fit a GE-F110 type engine with closer to twice the thrust? Regards... What's the point? It's still not going to handle all that well,perhaps worse with the extra speed. And probably not worth the money spent on the project. BTW,would the F-104's inlets then become the major restriction for airflow into the engine? I believe the jets that use the newer engines have much larger inlets. -- Jim Yanik jyanik-at-kua.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|