![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() So, in between level flight and vertical flight, there must be a region where the wing lift is less than in level flight, right? I'm saying there is a continuous reduction in the lift the wing must provide as the climb angle increases. Only two months till March flying starts...gotta solve this problem while we still have time! -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) Yeah....you got it......the lift is the cosine of the climb angle times the weight......... level.....0 degrees climb.. Cosine 0 = 1 so lift =100% glider weight 5 degree climb (reasonable tow climb angle) Cosine 5 = .996 so lift = 99.6% of glider's weight 45 degree climb (unlikely but just for demonstration) cosine 45 = . 707 so lift would be only 71% of glider's weight 90 degree climb Cosine 90 = o so lift would be zero. If we keep the airspeed constant, the drag shoud be constant....so the only variables are lift and thrust. as the thrust vector gets bigger, the direction of flgith gets steeper climb, and the lift vector gets smaller. Cookie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
another poor man's car engine conversion | jan olieslagers[_2_] | Home Built | 19 | February 22nd 09 03:49 PM |
Poor readability | Kees Mies | Owning | 2 | August 14th 04 04:22 AM |
Poor Guy | Bob Chilcoat | Owning | 6 | July 17th 04 06:45 PM |
I'm grateful for poor people who are willing to murder & die | Krztalizer | Military Aviation | 0 | April 20th 04 11:11 PM |
Concorde in FS2002: No lateral views | A. Bomanns | Simulators | 3 | July 19th 03 11:33 AM |