A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How to simply determine the L/D of your glider



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19  
Old January 12th 11, 03:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
mattm[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 167
Default How to simply determine the L/D of your glider

On Jan 11, 9:12*pm, Andreas Maurer wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:56:32 -0800 (PST), Gary Evans

wrote:
This flight computer I used required 3 pieces of speed/sink rate data
to represent the polar. Best L/D, speed at best L/d and V2.


This what all flight computers do - they convert these three points
into an approximated polar curve.

But how do you get these three points by the method described by Dave?

Andreas


Well, I'll bite. Here's what I do for the planes I fly:

First, I've been fortunate enough to fly planes that have Johnson
reports
available. I know there are probably Akaflieg reports as well, but I
haven't
seen those. I carefully extract the data points from Dick's polar
charts and
correct them for my flying weight (unfortunately always considerably
higher
than Dick!). I input the adjusted values into my PDA (which just
wants
the sink rate at 3 airspeeds, rather than the numbers listed above).
Finally,
I set the Polar Potential via experiment. Typically I'll set it to
90% and then
see how well my final glides work out. If I have a bunch of altitude
left over
on a glide then I'm doing better, and I'll increase the potential. If
I tend to fall
below glideslope a lot then I'll decrease the potential. For the most
part I've
wound up with values around 90% or 92% (which probably means I need to
work harder at tuning up the planes I fly).

Essentially this is a refinement of the beginner approach to glide
slopes:
take the published value and divide by 2 as a safety factor. I divide
by something
closer to 1.1 and usually make it home just fine. The times I've had
to
break off have been because I was below glideslope to begin with.

-- Matt
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is Newt Gingrich a racist, a bigot or simply a stupid man? Mark Piloting 0 April 13th 10 02:10 PM
Exxon Elite Oil: More favorable oil analysis or simply coincidence? Peter R. Owning 22 September 14th 06 03:50 PM
How do you determine remaining life of Ceconite covering? [email protected] Aviation Marketplace 2 October 8th 05 01:19 AM
Simply Beautiful ! Fil330 Owning 0 December 1st 03 07:49 PM
Simply Beautiful ! Fil330 General Aviation 0 December 1st 03 07:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.