![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 19, 11:35*pm, Sparkorama Sparkorama.
wrote: I'm just getting back into the sport after a long hiatus. I've seen that a lot of glider pilots fly with parachutes (ones they wear) and I have seen Ballistic Recovery System parachutes in planes as well. From my layman's view, it appears that getting out of a plane using a traditional chute after a mid-air collision seems exceedingly difficult and time-consuming. On the other hand, BRS chutes seem to deploy very fast and can be deployed very close to the ground. They can lower the entire plane safely to the ground in almost any terrain, and a few bruises to your bird or your body seems a lot better than certain death if you can't get out of a plane after a mid-air. So if this is true, and I am happy to say I am no expert, then why isn't everyone using these things? I think they should be mandatory in every new glider built. Thoughts? Spark -- Sparkorama Here we go with this mandatorys stuff again!! First of all you have at least one misconception......the aircraft is not "lowered to the ground with only a few bruises". The opening of the chute is a major event, the shock can cause considerable damage by itself. The descent rates are high, so considerable damage upon striking the ground. The device is "life saving" but not "aircraft saving". I has strongly considered a BRS when building my homebuilt plane......I ruled it out for a number of reasons. The greatest reason was that the design and structure of the aircraft wuld have had too have been highly modified.....strengthened....coping with strong force loads in the oposite direction......to with stand the opening shock of the chute............this required the doubling of the cockpit side walls, installation of metal cross members, etc. This alone would have added too much weight to the aircraft, not to mention the complications and weight of the mounting of the BRS unit itself......... Yeah, and then the cost........... Now on the other hand, there are many factory built aircraft with BRS....Like Cirrus.....a few gliders too..........these companies feel that the BRS is a good selling point....enhanced safety and all that.... In the world of ultralights, BRS type chutes are the "norm" fairly common in Light Sport aircraft too......I believe that just about ALL hanglider guys have a ballistic chute of some type. Cookie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F-104 Chutes out | Glen in Orlando | Aviation Photos | 0 | October 9th 09 07:01 PM |
Square chutes - ExtreemSports.wmv (0/1) | Tech Support | Soaring | 4 | December 15th 08 07:40 PM |
Square Chutes... | sisu1a | Soaring | 4 | December 9th 08 06:04 PM |
Puchaz spin - now wearing 'chutes | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 60 | February 14th 04 08:08 PM |