![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:15:19 -0500, "Paul F Austin"
wrote: "Scott Ferrin" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 06:36:25 -0600, "John Carrier" wrote: Relatively easy to fit a smaller diameter engine into the space in which a larger one fit. The retrofit of the 110 engine into the F-14's engine bays (TF-30's somewhat physically larger than a J-79 BTW) was a real squeeze. Compressor inlet temp can be handled by water injection (Skyburner F-4 had it, Greenameyer's F-104 was getting it). Canopy overheating is another problem. R / John If you have access to AW&ST you might want to read about Rascal that DARPA is kicking around. It's pretty interesting and it's along similar lines. Can you be more specific? I searched AvWeek's site for DARPA and Rascal and came up empty. It's the cover story for the September 22, 2003 issue of Aviation Week & Space Technology. Also of interest in that issue is "New Stealth" on page 32. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|