![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "Yama" wrote in message ... I agree with your main point (professional army better for Russia now) but honestly, couldn't we put this "conscripts no use in modern warfare" crap to rest? It sort of gets tiresome seeing it repeated everywhere with no basis whatsoever. Apart from the experience of the last 30 years during which conscript armies havent done terribly well in combat in comparison with professional forces. And what relevant experience would that be? I'll hazard a guess that you refer to for example, Desert Storm. Bzzt, wrong: main combat force of Iraqi army - the Republican Guards - were a volunteer professional force. That didn't seem to help them. Conscripts have their place in large scale high intensity warfare and an active militia with universal service such as that maintained by the Swiss or Noorwegians may well have its place but its notable that even those European nations that traditionally used conscription are tending to move to a volunteer military. Its particularly difficult to see how you can maintain the required standard in techinical services such as the air force or navy. Tasks requiring signifant technical expertise are manned by professional soldiers in both conscript and professional armies. That situation has not changed a bit since WW2. This does not mean that conscripts do not have a place in those services in supporting tasks. Even in all-pro forces, most mechanics etc actually receive pretty minimal training in any case, so from skill level point it's totally irrelevant whether one is a draftee or volunteer. In any event France ,Portugal,Spain and Italy are all in the process of abolishing conscription and Germany is reducing the length of military service. That's because their requirements have changed, not because of some fundamental change in nature of warfare. If your requirement is to defend your nation against unwelcome tourists, a conscript army is generally better. If your requirement is to subdue natives few thousand km's away from your homeland, professional force is better. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
RV-7a baggage area | David Smith | Home Built | 32 | December 15th 03 04:08 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |