![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Yama" wrote in message ... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "Yama" wrote in message ... I agree with your main point (professional army better for Russia now) but honestly, couldn't we put this "conscripts no use in modern warfare" crap to rest? It sort of gets tiresome seeing it repeated everywhere with no basis whatsoever. Apart from the experience of the last 30 years during which conscript armies havent done terribly well in combat in comparison with professional forces. And what relevant experience would that be? I'll hazard a guess that you refer to for example, Desert Storm. Bzzt, wrong: main combat force of Iraqi army - the Republican Guards - were a volunteer professional force. That didn't seem to help them. Incorrect I was thinking of the Argentines in the Falklands but since you mention the Republican guard they were in fact regarded as the main threat and at lest put up a fight. Conscripts have their place in large scale high intensity warfare and an active militia with universal service such as that maintained by the Swiss or Noorwegians may well have its place but its notable that even those European nations that traditionally used conscription are tending to move to a volunteer military. Its particularly difficult to see how you can maintain the required standard in techinical services such as the air force or navy. Tasks requiring signifant technical expertise are manned by professional soldiers in both conscript and professional armies. That situation has not changed a bit since WW2. This is untrue, during WW2 many of those technical tasks were done by conscripts, they had to be, the regulars provided the training and leadership cadres. This does not mean that conscripts do not have a place in those services in supporting tasks. Even in all-pro forces, most mechanics etc actually receive pretty minimal training in any case, so from skill level point it's totally irrelevant whether one is a draftee or volunteer. If you join the British Army as a REME Mechanic you'll get 12 weeks of basic training followed by up to 19 weeks of specialist training to get you to a basic proficiency level Further courses ranging from 2 to 11 weeks will be available as your carreer progresses and and senior NCO's may end up on the Military Plant Foreman course which runs for a year. For officer entrants a common route is the 46 week Professional Engineer Training course In any event France ,Portugal,Spain and Italy are all in the process of abolishing conscription and Germany is reducing the length of military service. That's because their requirements have changed, not because of some fundamental change in nature of warfare. If your requirement is to defend your nation against unwelcome tourists, a conscript army is generally better. If your requirement is to subdue natives few thousand km's away from your homeland, professional force is better. In fact the balance of skills needed HAS changed, while the poor bloody infantry are still the backbone of any army a regiment made up of soldiers who are trained to act on their own initiative, have a mix of skills and are well trained will always have an advantage over ill trained conscripts. One of the big problems the Argentines hit in the field was that their soldiers were used to returning their weapons to the armoury for cleaning and maintenance. This became a problem when soldiers not only didnt know how to clean their rifles and clear jams but didnt even have cleaning kits. Keith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
RV-7a baggage area | David Smith | Home Built | 32 | December 15th 03 04:08 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |