![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
steve gallacci wrote in message ...
robert arndt wrote: http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/annex/an51.htm ... more "borrowed" German-tech courtesy of Dr. Alexander Lippisch. From the Lippisch DM-1/P.13 we got the XF-92, F-102, F-106, and B-58. Not directly, as the DM-1 was a rather flawed design. It was a glider. The germans always built a glider first (usually a wooden mockup) to verify their calculations in just about every aircraft they built. The DM1 was crated and shipped to the USA and tested in a windtunnel and by all accounts handelled very well. The oversize verticle fin was removed and replaced by a bubble cannopy with a smaller fin and this looks rather modern, to test that configuration. The Americans weren't so stupid as to reject a good idea because it was "not invented here" although the Russians and Americans tried to discredit each other for being dependant on German socientists for a kick start in some areas. (Berier for instance asked that German atomic reasearchers in particular publish under Russian pseudonyms) and the US navy stopped development of heinkel He S11 jet engine becuase of russian ribbing. This is quite a loss as the He S11 had the diameter of an axial jet engine and the turbulent intake tollerance of a radial compressor engine by virtue of its diagonal compressor. The engines were thus slim enough to be burried in wings and draw air in via very slim leading edge slits rather than round air intakes. The DM-1 was I believe a research aircraft and possibly pre development aircraft for the Lippisch PM13a http://www.luft46.com/lippisch/lip13a.html The engine is interesting as was intended to be an inductor ramjet. This had a rocket motor in the center of the ramjet that was fired at zero speed both to provide thrust but mainly to induce an airflow so that fuel could be burned in the main airflow till the ramjet became self sustaining at about Mach 0.6 Because of the fuel shirtage the engine was supposed to be fired not by keosene but by pulverised granulated coal fed from a basket. This is not preposterous to anyone that has seen a jet of powdered coal or seen how explosive coal dust could be. I suspect the rocket fuel would have been heavy fuel oil obtained from the cokeing or pyrolisis of coal and the oxidiser nitric acid both of which could be made with minimum infrastructure and fire hypergolically. The very basic idea of a "delta" wing was his first, but it would not have been any kind of stretch for others to do it, and the original work on the XF-92 (especially in its original form) owes very little to Lippisch. Except all the inspiration, theory and supersonic wind tunnel testing it was based on. What happens to the aerodynamic center of pressure at Mach 1+ both above and below What happends to the momment? When the USSR and USA start building ground effect aircraft that too will be based on Alexanders Lippisch's work. There was mass of german supersonic data. It went beyond just the idea of a deltawing buit to well theorised and tested data. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
50% of NAZI oil was supplied from US | Grantland | Military Aviation | 106 | January 18th 14 07:58 PM |
German KT-P2 Celestial Navigation Kompass | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:51 PM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |
German historian provokes row over war photos | BackToNormal | Military Aviation | 21 | October 24th 03 11:32 PM |
Joint German-Israeli airforce excersie (Israeli airforce beats German pilots) | Quant | Military Aviation | 8 | September 25th 03 05:41 PM |