Question about the F-22 and cost.

"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:59:34 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:16:47 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"Denyav" wrote in message
...
The impression I'd got was that the Air Force is convinced it can
get
295 if the funding was just left alone ie. stable, so they could
try
to work the problem.


Air Force will eventually get 80-110 Jurassicfighters and most of
them
will
probably be converted to ECM aircraft.

Now now Denyav, little stinky Ferrin is just catching up with the 180
I
posted a year ago. You can't expect him to convert to reality so
soon.

Strakes.

Yes little stinky, Lockmart tried to use 8 inch strakes to correct their
tail problems. do try and keep up.

You're getting more and more respectable all the time. Still just as
full of **** as ever though.

I was always respectable Ferrin, you have been a fool.

I have already written that I will not oppose the production run any longer,
(Georgia pork) so I don't see why you can't just discuss the numbers issue
in a sober manner. The money is already spent, that is what jumping
straight to production was all about, instead of the 19 airframe FSD that is
real. Perhaps the titanium tail spar is a fix and perhaps not, there is no
way to know until the airplane stacks up some hours. (AV19)

Now go back to aviation and stop your personality attack. The tab to me is
so wide that there is no possibility of discrediting me, so calm down.