![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
According to Curt Johnson :
You can compute flight time from the cruise speed of the aircraft and the distance involved. Add 20 minutes or so at each end for preflight checks and parking, fueling, delays... Love Field (KDAL) is a busy airport, and it's right in the middle of some very busy airspace. It can be a bit hectic for a small plane, but there are plenty of small planes in the airspace even during busy commercial traffic times. I've flown a much smaller Cessna 172 into Love Field on a high tempo Friday afternoon and wouldn't hesitate to do it again. You can see what the airport looks like at: http://flightaware.com/resources/airport/KDAL/map As busy airports go, it's actually pretty small -- space constrained from being located in a dense metropolitan area. Taxi times are quick and direct. You can be parked and out of the plane within a few minutes of touching down. Note the "FBOs" tab on that site. An FBO is a "Fixed Base Operator" and that's where a pilot would take his plane to refuel, park, and make arrangements for ground transportation. Love Field has several FBOs which handle private aircraft of all sizes. For flight times, here's a Cessna 210 that made the flight from KAMA to KDAL last September: http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N...837Z/KAMA/KDAL The flight took 2 hours and 6 minutes. That's "wheels up" to "wheels down" not accounting for taxi time. Here are a bunch of pictures of Cessna 210s: http://flightaware.com/photos/aircrafttype/C210 If the pilot is flying an instrument flight plan, there are web sites (flightaware.com is one) that show the radar tracking info. If the pilot is flying VFR, and not in contact with air traffic control, there is no record kept. This is an important point. Any pilot with a C210 can be expected to have an instrument rating and fly "IFR" with full radar contact with the FAA for anything more than a short trip. It's that IFR flight plan and radar contact that allows sites like FlightAware to track an aircraft. However, there's no requirement at all for an airplane to fly IFR as long as the weather permits Visual Flight Rules (VFR) flight. If a pilot wanted to be sneaky, they wouldn't file a flight plan, they'd fly VFR (weather permitting) and the ability for others to track that flight or verify the details of travel would be significantly curtailed. There would still be exposure in the form of FBO staff or enthusiasts monitoring the (open and unencrypted) radio communications at the relevant airports. Even flying VFR there are countless witnesses to a plane's operations and location. Plane spotters, especially at a field like KDAL might have taken pictures of the plane landing. Someone refuelled it. It would be parked in the open on "the ramp" at the airport for some period of time. Thanks for taking the trouble to do the research. I hate it when the details are wrong too. It ruins the illusion. Agreed. So true... -- David McNett |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Research project | soli | Simulators | 0 | April 21st 07 06:09 PM |
Looking for Phd research topic | Speedbird | General Aviation | 8 | August 2nd 06 09:10 AM |
Help with research | Rob | General Aviation | 4 | February 4th 05 04:47 AM |
crash research - A-4 in ND | mah | Naval Aviation | 1 | August 31st 04 06:46 PM |
crash research - A-4 in ND | mah | Military Aviation | 0 | August 12th 04 02:48 AM |