![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "Yama" wrote in message ... Falklands are islands, so deployment problems remained regardless of distance. Horse**** Its a hell of alot easier for Britain to deploy troops to the Isle of Wight than it is for Argentina Obviously yes, but it still much more difficult than moving them by trains or road. Again, do you seriously think that British Army and Royal Marines could have taken Argentinian army on their mainland? Again NO , Why not? I thought they were much more effective than ill-trained Argentinan military? Exactly - volunteer, selected palace guard was obviously better instrument of power for Saddam than draftees. Their military prowess was not particularly relevant... On the contrary it was a core requirement. The politically reliable force was his last defense against an army revolt. ....which is why they were given better equipment and more resources. Ah, I see the confusion. Most conscript armies do not have "combat units" in the sense you talk, because there is no need to deploy them anywhere as we do not have former, current or future colonies to fight over. Should the need arise, combat formations are formed either expanding the training units or from scratch according to mobilization plans. Which is a bit unfortunate if the enemy isnt considerate enough to give you advanced warning of his plans For most countries, it's rather unlikely that someone just invades them out of blue sky. If such threat exists, it can be dealt with longer conscription time or keeping separate high-readiness units. Currently Finnish conscripts serve 180 to 360 days, depending on their task or rank. That time is almost wholly spent on training. Which leaves exactly who guarding the interests of the nation ? Like what interests? Fine, if you don't want to believe then don't. If we go by that route, I could ask you what are YOUR sources for that dubious "Argies couldn't maintain their rifles" -story. Multiple sources , here's just one http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/s2.cfm?id=341922002 "I was 19 when they sent us to the Falklands," he says. "I had done my military service, but I think I'd only touched a gun once for about 15 minutes. I didn't have a clue how to load a rifle." Then Argentinian military training has been truly atrocious and tells absolutely nothing about actual battle performance of a proper conscript army. If anything, with that sort of training it's surprising they managed to put up even that much resistance. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
RV-7a baggage area | David Smith | Home Built | 32 | December 15th 03 04:08 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |