![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 13, 9:25*am, wrote:
On May 13, 12:20*am, Frank Whiteley wrote: On May 12, 6:32*pm, John Cochrane wrote: One thing that all of the various sanctioning bodies (FAI/IGC/NACs) will have to address at some point is a class that is primarily aimed at lowest possible cost. * In the US we have the 1-26, but that's not necessarily a long-term or broad enough solution. * Every other racing sport I can think of has events and classes that are very specifically aimed at low cost of entry (Sunfish or equivalent in sailing; all sorts of "stock" classes in various forms of motor racing). * If "Club Class" starts to mean $30K or more investment, *to be competitive, then it probably serves us right if the "racing" aspect of the sport declines. They did, give them credit. The IGC created the world class, in response to this sentiment. It was exactly your "sunfish" class. And pilots around the world resoundly rejected it. They voted with their wallets, and 18 meter gliders, mostly with motors, are the only things selling right now. Not even standard or 15m are selling. It is a great theory. It was tried. And it failed. John Cochrane John Cochrane Class designed by committee when other options were clearly evident. Although the 13.5m class would embrace several orphaned designs, including the PW5, support from the SSA is not there. Frank Whiteley- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - This is not correct- The topic of 13.5M is heavily on the agenda for the RC this Fall. One issue has been the lack of clarity on what the class definition will be at the world level. As of the last IGC meeting, this is now defined. The topic of what this class will be in the US will likely be one of the most important ones on this year's pilot poll. Current, VERY preliminary thinking would define as 13.5M max span, handicapped, likely no water. This would be the most likely to get best participation. Anyone with input is encouraged to provide comments to the RC. UH RC Chair Thanks for the update. That wasn't the sense I got in January. Frank |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wurtsboro Soaring Article - say what? | Mike[_28_] | Soaring | 7 | November 5th 10 02:26 PM |
NYT soaring article | Bullwinkle | Soaring | 1 | September 22nd 07 02:15 PM |
NYT Soaring Article | C Koenig | Soaring | 0 | September 21st 07 02:11 PM |
Good Article on Soaring | Jim Vincent | Soaring | 3 | June 27th 06 04:42 PM |
Soaring Article | Mike | Soaring | 1 | June 30th 05 12:58 AM |