![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 22, 7:04*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Dave Doe writes: Does anyone have any figures and references for about what ratio lift is produced by Newton's Laws and Bernoulli's Laws? All lift is produced by Newton's third law of motion. Air is forced downwards by the wings, and this produces an equal and opposite force that attempts to raise the wings, and that is lift. How the air is forced downwards is irrelevant, as long as it happens. In practice, principles discovered by Bernoulli and others play a role in diverting the air flow when this is accomplished by an airfoil. Actually, if I'm reading you right, I would rephrase this just a bit, as it feeds into the problems we as instructors have in "re- explaining" lift to students. STRESSING either Newton or Bernoulli in the lift explanation causes more than a modicum of confusion UNLESS it's done by including BOTH theories in the explanation. You've done that actually. I would just enhance things a bit more :-) Read what Orval says above. He is absolutely correct. BOTH Newton and Bernoulli are COMPLETE explanations for lift, which is interesting in another respect, as neither man had lift in mind with their work. The simple truth of it is that each explanation is totally correct and is interchangeable with the other. Each explains the same thing without relying on the other and BOTH are occurring simultaneously. It's a common misconception that Bernoulli and Newton EACH contribute INDIVIDUALLY to form a TOTAL of the lift produced. This explanation is incorrect and should be discouraged. When I dealt with the lift issue with instructors in seminar, my personal approach was to favor the Newtonian explanation as in my opinion student pilots can grasp Newton a lot easier than Bernoulli, but I've ALWAYS made it habit NEVER to leave Bernoulli out in the cold. The correct way to deal with the lift issue is to explain to those asking that BOTH explanations are complete by themselves, and Newton might be the easier of the two to explain. Dudley Henriques |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Three take offs = three landings at Newton MS and Madison MS - Video | [email protected] | Piloting | 39 | November 28th 09 01:22 AM |
How can the Magnus effect be explained with Bernoulli? | Mikki | Piloting | 4 | June 24th 09 05:51 AM |
Lift-to-Drag Ratio? | Toks Desalu | Home Built | 6 | November 23rd 03 10:53 PM |
The bernoulli theory of starting a long thread | David CL Francis | Piloting | 7 | October 26th 03 07:40 PM |
worked fairly well - the German 37mm and British 40mm, frank mitch newton on Stukas | fmn2 | Naval Aviation | 1 | August 10th 03 02:14 AM |