![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Doe writes:
If you are right, I'd expect to see planes with the airfoil upsidedown (with the increased camber on the bottom), but that's not the case (and I'm talking about the *wings* here, not the horizontal stabiliser ![]() Actually it is. NASA has tested airfoils with a camber on the bottom, and they fly just as well as airfoils with a camber on the top. I don't know what became of the research, though. As a I recall, they had some airfoils that were very good at preventing stalls, but I suppose they had other disadvantages (drag problems?). I think you have explained though, that the Bernoulli effect occurs with a barn door too at an angle of attack - however it is a lot less *efficient* without that camber (which will continue to 'suck' air down - as the camber continues to change direction - and therefore drag the viscous air around it with it). I hope you'll agree with that. Good airfoil designs can reduce drag and improve stall characteristics, but generating lift requires only a positive angle of attack. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Three take offs = three landings at Newton MS and Madison MS - Video | [email protected] | Piloting | 39 | November 28th 09 01:22 AM |
How can the Magnus effect be explained with Bernoulli? | Mikki | Piloting | 4 | June 24th 09 05:51 AM |
Lift-to-Drag Ratio? | Toks Desalu | Home Built | 6 | November 23rd 03 10:53 PM |
The bernoulli theory of starting a long thread | David CL Francis | Piloting | 7 | October 26th 03 07:40 PM |
worked fairly well - the German 37mm and British 40mm, frank mitch newton on Stukas | fmn2 | Naval Aviation | 1 | August 10th 03 02:14 AM |