![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Am 22.06.2011 20:44, johngalloway wrote:
The diagram on page 12 of this Powerpoint presentation on the Flarm website shows very clearly the situations in which Flarm is most or least useful: http://www.flarm.com/files/basic_presentation_en.ppt In busy contest thermal gaggles with lots of Flarmed gliders there are so many alarms that you often can't tell or see which other glider is Flarming you and have to regard it as a serious ongoing prompt to vigorous Seeing and Avoiding - in the knowledge that the other pilot/ will also be getting an alarm and will hopefully be doing the same. That is very useful in its own way but it is a very different type of situational awareness from the use of Flarm in the cruise or approaching a thermal gaggle. I think that even if a magical Flarm were able to produce positional and conflict information with zero error it would be impossible to do much better for the case of busy similarly centered gaggles because the gliders are continually making unpredictable centering and avoidance corrections. John Galloway I had the pleasure of flying in a contest recently where all planes were equipped with FLARM. Having several years of experience with flying FLARM equipped gliders both in X/C and contest gaggle situations, I have the impression that especially in gaggle situations the FLARM algorithm has improved a lot with the current software version 5.xx. I had almost no false alarms, and a few positive alarms in situations where an alarm was appropriate. I encountered one situation where I had no alarm, although the situation might have developed into a close approach. This was a situation where I was flying vertically underneath of another glider, with the vertical distance becoming smaller. This is one of the "weak spots" because of the usual position of the FLARM aerial the view below the aircraft is obstructed. As the other glider was clearly visible, there was no real danger though. In the course of that contest, I had one situation en route where FLARM provided important additional information. I already had spotted one glider that was approching me on the same height in my 12 o'clock position, and made a slight movement to the right. At that moment, the FLARM was going off, showing me that there actually were two targets approaching me. Scanning the horizon again I spotted the second plane, and we all were able to pass each other in safe distances with very little corrections of our course. FLARM has its limitations, but it certainly can help to avoid dangerous situations by giving the pilot additional informations on top of the close lookout. -- Peter Scholz ASW24 JE |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Saturday pre practice 18 Meters USA #711 reporting | Tom[_13_] | Soaring | 3 | June 19th 11 04:46 AM |
!st practice day, Hobbs, USA. 2007 # 711 reporting. | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | July 17th 06 04:33 AM |
Hobbs Practice 7-3 # 711 reporting | TomnKeyLargo | Soaring | 1 | July 4th 04 10:53 AM |
Hobbs Pre-practice 7-2 # 711 reporting | TomnKeyLargo | Soaring | 1 | July 3rd 04 06:58 AM |
LS8-18 FS after Hobbs (USA) | SAM AND LEIGH ZIMMERMAN | Soaring | 1 | April 5th 04 12:43 PM |