![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 02:30:54 GMT, Jerry Springer
wrote: Corky Scott wrote: On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 02:51:50 GMT, (Drew Dalgleish) wrote: Well I had my medical with the doctor that owns one of the subject planes today. In our short conversation I asked what specific problems he'd had with the conversion. He says the only problem has been with the computer setting the fuel mixture too rich. They had a lot of trouble sorting that out and are now running without using the O2 sensors. He and his father have owned this plane for many years origionally with the franklin engine and later with a lycoming. He was ready to sell the plane due to poor performance off the water and slow climb rates but since doing the conversion he is very happy with the performance now. His takeoff distances are greatly reduced, cruise has increased by 5mph, climb rates are as high as 1500fpm. ( instead of 100fpm with the franklin on a hot day ) and his fuel burn has dropped from 12 to 8.8gph. on autofeul. Drew Dalgleish Drew Drew Drew, how dare you suggest that the V-8 powered Seabees actually perform better than their Franklin or Lycoming powered predecessors. Prepare to be "BObbed"! Corky Scott I well let Bob do the BObbed part but I do have a couple questions about the above post by the guy that said he talked to someone that changed engines. I find the numbers difference very hard to believe without knowing more facts. And this may have all been explained somewhere and I can't find the info. What are the power output comparisons? I find the difference between 100 fpm and 1500 fpm pretty astonishing difference and really find it hard to believe. Also from 12 gph to 8.8 gph and 5 faster cruise is also pretty hard to believe. I think that if the auto engine proponents are going to convince the unbelieving they need to at least give honest and true numbers. Jerry I lurk here pretty much daily and was following this thread. So when I had my medical I asked the doctor about his plane and reported what he told me. I don't have any reason to believe he would lie about his numbers. He's not the one selling the engines he's just one outwardly very satisfied customer. I'm sure the 100fpm climb was fully loaded on the hottest day of the year and 1500fpm came when it was a little cooler and lighter. Drew |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
human powered flight | patrick timony | Home Built | 10 | September 16th 03 03:38 AM |
Illusive elastic powered Ornithopter | Mike Hindle | Home Built | 6 | September 15th 03 03:32 PM |
Pre-Rotator Powered by Compressed Air? | nuke | Home Built | 8 | July 30th 03 12:36 PM |
Powered Parachute Plans | MJC | Home Built | 4 | July 15th 03 07:29 PM |
Powered Parachute Plans- correction | Cy Galley | Home Built | 0 | July 11th 03 03:43 AM |