![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:31:18 -0400, "vaughn"
wrote: "Mike Rhodes" wrote in message news ![]() By simple geometry the forward wing of a dihedraled pair in a skid will have the steepest angle of attack, and the greatest amount of lift, and therefore the one most likely to stall. (Not the wing inside inside of the skid.) Aileron use will not change that -- except they force the aircraft to remain in a skid when operated "crossed controlled." Aileron use affects the effective angle of attack of a wing. One way to turn mere wing drop (caused by a stall or near-stall) into a real spin is to use aileron to try to raise the stalled wing. This is one of thse disturbing cases where a pilot's instinctive reaction can kill! So the adverse yaw on a wing on the verge of a stall will pull the aircraft into a dangerous spin, when it would have been just a stall. The slow, draggy aileron will yaw the aircraft like a rudder. Wing dihedral will cause the opposite wing to rise into the yaw. Still, full ailerons may be applied to counter the roll. But the aircraft rolls over surprisingly in the direction opposite of the applied aileron. This is because of wing dihedral (and inherent aircraft stability); not because of wing stall, or because the aileron changes the angle of attack of that wing to cause it to stall. The aileron is acting like a rudder to yaw the aircraft. Dihedral stability then rolls the aircraft -- oppositely. But since the aircraft has rolled then the elevator no longer has gravity (or the inertia of a bank) to push against, so angle of attack rises rapidly. Then the wings stall. The aircraft is in an aerobatic attitude. The tail feathers will ensure the nose will then point down. The problem with uncoordinated controls and the stall is that, in a coordinated bank, the elevator pushes 'up' against the COG properly. But when the turn is not coordinated (when the aircraft just rolls over) then the elevator lift is no longer restrained by the load of the COG, and can raise the nose of the aircraft rapidly such that the wings then stall. Slips and skids, however, do not generally cause the plane to roll. In those conditions elevator control of the COG is not usually in doubt. When an aircraft is slow then a lot of elevator is applied to hold the nose up. Other than the flare, this condition is most likely to occur when doing stalls. It is could also occur during the turn when a pilot has overshot final from base. That is the danger point on final. And the roll into a spin probably came while using coordinated controls. The aircraft just stalled in the turn. It does not typically happen during a level approach while using crossed controls to skid the aircraft to align with the runway. (Which students may instinctively do to fine-tune their approach, which instructors may instinctively hate. It seems a matter of prejudice.) -- Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Crab, slips, and crossed controls | Amine | Piloting | 190 | September 27th 08 07:59 PM |
A reluctance to take the controls | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 161 | December 1st 06 08:27 PM |
Cockpit Controls | [email protected] | Rotorcraft | 5 | August 1st 05 02:14 PM |
Kevin's First Day at The Controls | SHIVER ME TIMBERS | Rotorcraft | 0 | March 29th 05 05:01 AM |
Homebuilt controls | Hugh Roberton | Simulators | 4 | February 11th 04 05:28 AM |