![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's beginning to seem like common practice to have multiple accidents
at glider contests these days. I really hate to see accidents get hushed up, nothing mentioned on the contest report, except for a simple "W" and "F" next to the persons score. We can all learn from these accidents, why hide them? Why not make changes to avoid these from recurring. Anyone who flies contests knows they aren't immune from accidents. After reading the debate between 80 miles of unlandable terrain at Logan, I looked over the turnpoint list on google earth. I noticed there are large number of turnpoints that are Mountain Peaks. Years ago when camera's were required to take a picture of an easily identifiable turnpiont, a Mountain Peak might have been a good turnpoint. But now in the age of GPS's, we don't so much need an easily identifiable turnpoint. Especially when we are flying into a big turn cylinder. And besides, nobody needs glide navigation information into the top of a mountain. A contest I flew in a few years ago, had a river as a turnpoint. A local pilot showed me on google earth a perfect field two miles away from the river. Why not have this perfect field as a turnpoint? Wouldn't it be nicer to have distance, direction and glide navigation information into this perfect field rather than the river? Another task I flew had no turnpoints listed between the final turn point and the finish cylinder which was 18 miles. There was no obvious places to land, except for one hidden grass runway that was kept mowed. I landedat this hidden grass runway in a Piper Cub a couple days later. Why wasn't this listed into the turnpoint database? I know that the contest committee reads this and it would sure be great if there could be a push for revamping the turnpoint database to include excellent places to land and remove turnpoints that don't help you when you get low. I love this sport very much, and I would sure hate to see more accidents cause the participation rate to dwindle down even more. Why don't we overhaul our turnpoint databases to improve safety??? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
To overhaul or not to Overhaul, that is the question- | EridanMan | Owning | 19 | May 12th 06 11:58 PM |
Turnpoint database | [email protected] | Soaring | 6 | November 11th 05 11:11 PM |
Turnpoint conversion SW? | For Example John Smith | Soaring | 11 | March 23rd 05 06:56 PM |
Turnpoint descriptions | Tuno | Soaring | 5 | June 27th 04 02:41 PM |
FAI turnpoint Question | Mark Grubb | Soaring | 13 | February 15th 04 02:31 AM |