A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Turnpoint Database's Need Overhaul



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old August 6th 11, 07:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Scott Alexander[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 161
Default Turnpoint Database's Need Overhaul

It's beginning to seem like common practice to have multiple accidents
at glider contests these days. I really hate to see accidents get
hushed up, nothing mentioned on the contest report, except for a
simple "W" and "F" next to the persons score. We can all learn from
these accidents, why hide them? Why not make changes to avoid these
from recurring. Anyone who flies contests knows they aren't immune
from accidents.

After reading the debate between 80 miles of unlandable terrain at
Logan, I looked over the turnpoint list on google earth. I noticed
there are large number of turnpoints that are Mountain Peaks. Years
ago when camera's were required to take a picture of an easily
identifiable turnpiont, a Mountain Peak might have been a good
turnpoint. But now in the age of GPS's, we don't so much need an
easily identifiable turnpoint. Especially when we are flying into a
big turn cylinder. And besides, nobody needs glide navigation
information into the top of a mountain.

A contest I flew in a few years ago, had a river as a turnpoint. A
local pilot showed me on google earth a perfect field two miles away
from the river. Why not have this perfect field as a turnpoint?
Wouldn't it be nicer to have distance, direction and glide navigation
information into this perfect field rather than the river?

Another task I flew had no turnpoints listed between the final turn
point and the finish cylinder which was 18 miles. There was no
obvious places to land, except for one hidden grass runway that was
kept mowed. I landedat this hidden grass runway in a Piper Cub a
couple days later. Why wasn't this listed into the turnpoint
database?

I know that the contest committee reads this and it would sure be
great if there could be a push for revamping the turnpoint database to
include excellent places to land and remove turnpoints that don't help
you when you get low.


I love this sport very much, and I would sure hate to see more
accidents cause the participation rate to dwindle down even more. Why
don't we overhaul our turnpoint databases to improve safety???
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
To overhaul or not to Overhaul, that is the question- EridanMan Owning 19 May 12th 06 11:58 PM
Turnpoint database [email protected] Soaring 6 November 11th 05 11:11 PM
Turnpoint conversion SW? For Example John Smith Soaring 11 March 23rd 05 06:56 PM
Turnpoint descriptions Tuno Soaring 5 June 27th 04 02:41 PM
FAI turnpoint Question Mark Grubb Soaring 13 February 15th 04 02:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.