Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14?

"Ian" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"R. David Steele" wrote in message
...

|The Tomcat is gone quicker than you can think....
|There is a big push by CNO to axe the F-14 sooner than planned, like
|now is too late...watch and see.
|
|The F/A-18 (I assume you mean the B/C/D models) already has a
|replacement, E/F. I don't think you are following current Naval
|Aviation very well.
|
|There is no need to replace the E/F Hornet, it will be pulling
|fighter/CAP/FAC/Bomber/tanker etc. duties for the next 10 years.
|Totally capable of performing all the above, with no current or
future
|enemy threat that can match it.

Yes, I am aware that the E/F variants are the upgrade to the
current F/A-18 and the F-14. However by the time the FB-22 is
online, even those versions will be dated.

Less dated than the F-22.

You are not considering the F-22's two greatest flaws, the pre-96 Ada
and
the Mil-spec components. The entire procurement of the F/A-18E is a
generation ahead of the F-22.

What language is F-22 software written in? I presume Ada-95?

The F-22 is older than that.

The F-35 has a chance of being more successful than the F-22 based solely on
it being post '96 Ada and having a late infusion of the RPL model. The
system itself has moved on since the parting and coding of the F-22.