A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

About when did a US/CCCP war become suicidal?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #28  
Old February 25th 04, 01:52 PM
Peter Stickney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Peter Skelton writes:
On 24 Feb 2004 21:50:10 -0800, (WaltBJ)
wrote:

2) I should think doctrine on the possible use of nuclear weapons took
a serious hit when a real sober look was taken of the two nuclear
accidents the USSR experienced - Chelyabinsk and Chernobyl. The USSR
never ever achieved the capability to feed all its people from its own
resources and what fallout from numerous nuclear weapons would do to
the arable lands of the Ukraine really doesn't bear thinking about.

The doctrine was gone by 1975. What we saw after that was
think-tank blather about the possibility of nuclear war without
escallation. Examples: on our side the potential use of
battlefield weapons in Europe (we'd had them earlier and
withdrawn all except tactical nukes on figfhter-bombers, IIRC) on
theirs taking out naval assets (they went for really big ASMs
instead or after).


Uhm - _that_ didn't happen until 1990-91, with the adoption of the
Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty. Europe, on both sidea of the
East/West divide, all through the '60s, '60s, and '80s was a forest of
nuclear warheads and delivery systems. In addition to the airplane
delivered weapons, there were, througn most of the '60s, a huge number
of Mace (TM-61) Cruise missiles. There were scade of short range
ballistic missiles, originally Redstones & Corporals, then Pershing &
Sergeants, and, finally, Pershings & Pershing IIs, and Lances.
Ballistic That doesn't count the battlefield systems like the Honest
John Rockets and AFAPs (Artillery Fired Atomic Projectiles).
Most of these systems, on the NATO side, were developed in the U.S.,
but the French had also developed theirs. (MSBS, SSBS, and Pluton).
In the case of systems fieldsd by NATO partners, (With the exception
of the wholly autonomous French systems, and hte Brits), the warheads
were held in a Dual Custody arrangement, as U.S. owned and secured
weapons, where their release required the agreement of the
U.S. Nactional Command Authority (Warhead), and the Host nation;s
Government (delivery System). If things had turned nasty before the
Iron Curtain fell, there would have been Germans, Belgians, Dutch,
Italians, Turks, and Greeks all firing off nukes.

The Warsaw Pact side had similar systems, and similar command
arrangements.

--
Pete Stickney
A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many
bad measures. -- Daniel Webster
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.