![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:56:47 GMT, "Doug \"Woody\" and Erin Beal"
wrote: On 2/25/04 7:23 AM, in article , "Keith Willshaw" wrote: I've got time in lots of jets with autothrottles, so spare me the preaching to the choir. I bring up the autothrottle issue on the Airbus because of their famous mishap with a jet that turned out to be the "world's most expensive chainsaw" a few years back. That same throttle automation was responsible for a Russian Airbus doing a wingover about 10 years ago too. IIRC the first incident you mentioned occured during an airshow where the autothrottle had been disengaged so the pilot could get closer to teh edge of the envelope (too close as it turned out). To me, the no-greater-than-60-degrees-AOB feature on the A320 is disturbing. The pre-supposition by the folks at Airbus seems to be that the pilot needs to be kept in a box because he's incapable of staying there on his own. Err, I'm not sure of your point here. If the pilots are good enough to avoid 60 degree AOB (Angle of Bank I assume), then what does it matter if the computer would stop them going faster? And if they aren't that competent, then the computer should damn well stop them playing silly buggers. This is the same issue IMO as the G limits built into the FBW software on most modern aircraft. Some pilots I've spoken to (specifically F-16 drivers) object to a computer telling them they can't pull that much g *if they have to* in a life or death situation. Other point out that if they did exceed the limits they'd likely pull of the wings, blow a few blood vessels, or flame out - possibly all 3, and if the computer stops them doing that, that's fine by them. AS for the current approaches by Boeing and Airbus, I was under teh impression that with the latest Boeing products (777 and 737NG) they are virtually indistinguishable to Airbus in their treatmetn of pilots as system managers, simply becasue the computers do a better job of keeping on time and min fuel consumption, and money's what the game's about. Peter Kemp --- Peter Kemp Life is short - drink faster |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"C-175 SoCal Beware" Original Poster Replies | Bill Berle | Aviation Marketplace | 8 | July 8th 04 07:01 AM |
More LED's | Veeduber | Home Built | 19 | June 9th 04 10:07 PM |
Replace fabric with glass | Ernest Christley | Home Built | 38 | April 17th 04 11:37 AM |
RAN to get new LSD class vessel to replace 5 logistic vessels ... | Aerophotos | Military Aviation | 10 | November 3rd 03 11:49 PM |
Air Force to replace enlisted historians with civilians | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 1 | October 22nd 03 09:41 AM |