![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 21:55:56 -0500, "Paul F Austin"
wrote: Apparentley the time taken from the bounce until the Typhoons had achieved a clear shot on the F15E's rear l was 9 seconds. Not Too Shabby!!! Wake me when they do a planned training sortie with the C models from Lakenheath. The other problem is that they are comparing aircraft whose mechanical technology is 20 years apart. Electronics may be equal(even if you ignore the fact that the 'E' is configured/equipped for a strike role rather than A2A) but the mechanical design has several generations of difference. Actually,_one_generation apart although that generation is about 30 years long. Typhoon benefits from better propulsion technology, controls technology and somewhat better structural technology so it would be strange if a Typhoon wasn't substantially better than a F-15C. In fact if it turns out not to be, a passel of British aero- and -propulsion engineers should be looking for jobs. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about the Eurofighter's air intakes. | Urban Fredriksson | Military Aviation | 0 | January 30th 04 04:18 PM |
China to buy Eurofighters? | phil hunt | Military Aviation | 90 | December 29th 03 05:16 PM |
Malaysian MiG-29s got trounced by RN Sea Harrier F/A2s in Exercise Flying Fish | KDR | Military Aviation | 29 | October 7th 03 06:30 PM |
Impact of Eurofighters in the Middle East | Quant | Military Aviation | 164 | October 4th 03 04:33 PM |