A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rumsfeld and flying



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old March 7th 04, 08:27 AM
Buzzer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 07 Mar 2004 04:38:28 GMT, (ArtKramr) wrote:

Subject: Rumsfeld and flying
From: Buzzer

Date: 3/6/04 8:31 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

On 07 Mar 2004 03:25:15 GMT,
(BUFDRVR) wrote:

I find it interesting that Rumsfeld
was an instructor who had never been to combat.

It's hard for me to believe that you cannot conceptualize that not everyone
during times of combat operations sees action. I've got several good friends
who, through no fault of their own, have exactly *zero* combat hours. These
guys would have jumped on a jet for England or Diego Garcia in a heart beat,
but it wasn't thier job. What was there job? They were teaching brand new
navigators and co-pilots how to operate the B-52, a critical job considering
the drastic under manning we had (and have) in the B-52. You need to get it

out
of your thick head that what you were doing on a daily basis was the most
important job in the history of the world and anyone who wasn't doing it was

a
slackard.

I know I'm wasting my time here....why do I bother?


Your good friends were a bunch of slackers. Everyone knows all you
have to do is volunteer for combat and off you go. An even worse
situation is if an instructor doesn't have combat time all the
trainees will not respect them.
The more I think about it I wonder if the combat veterans in WWII
pulled a reverse Vietnam war situation. When they returned home they
spit on the civilians that stayed stateside doing useless things like
building Arts aircraft, building bombs and ammo, ect..?


You are not far wrong. Most of those who built our planes and ammo were woman
and old men and high school kids. Damn few who could go to war stayed behind,


Did any of your relatives stay behind in WWII Art?
Did they all see combat?
How many of your relatives served during the Civil War, and wars after
that? All of them in combat?

And when we all came back and found that someone our age got a deferment for
any reason other than physical we did nott ake kindly to them But those were
different times with obviously different standards.


Really Art it isn't much different today. It is still the I was in
combat and you weren't from the Korean war, Vietnam, etc. I believe
it is one of the reasons veterans can't get together and present a
united front like AARP and the senior citizens. One of the reasons the
goverment can walk all over veterans and retired military and get away
with it..
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boeing Boondoggle Larry Dighera Military Aviation 77 September 15th 04 02:39 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.