A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Analyzing US Competition Flights



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19  
Old March 15th 12, 12:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Papa3[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 753
Default Analyzing US Competition Flights

On Wednesday, March 14, 2012 7:18:52 PM UTC-4, John Cochrane wrote:

The last time the concept was discussed at an SRA meeting the vote was
I believe 39 to 1 against. But, hey, we used to think the rolling
finish one foot over the airport fence was a good idea too. Maybe some
sharp CD will ask for this by waiver and we can see how it works out
(hint hint)

John Cochrane


Make it 40:1 against. It's just another example of a highly complex solution to a non-problem.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
R9N Logan Competition Ron Gleason Soaring 1 July 20th 10 08:12 PM
304S in competition again Tim Mara Soaring 7 July 25th 08 06:41 PM
See You Competition Mal[_4_] Soaring 0 August 14th 07 01:56 PM
Satellite wx competition john smith Piloting 0 February 10th 06 02:03 AM
Competition I.D. Ray Lovinggood Soaring 22 December 17th 03 12:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.