|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
April 6th 12, 11:42 PM
posted to rec.aviation.soaring
|
|||
|
|||
Question for US Rules committee on AH capability within LX NAV computers?
At 18:35 06 April 2012, John Godfrey QT wrote:
With all due respect, the RC has not "decided" to restrict anything. What = the RC has done is provide a way for instrument manufacturers and software = developers who choose to include AH capability in their product to remain c= ompliant with a very long standing (decades) FAI rule. QT Rules Committee It is not an FAI Rule. Nothing to prevent the fitting or indeed use of AH in civilised parts of the world. By all means restrict the members in your own country if that is your wish but accept that it is totally your responsibility not the FAI. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| U.S.A Rules Committee: We Didn't Mean It? | SoarPoint | Soaring | 3 | November 15th 10 02:06 PM |
| US Rules Poll and Rules Committee Election | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 0 | December 1st 06 01:36 AM |
| SSA Rules Poll and Rules Committee Election | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 2 | October 6th 06 03:27 PM |
| US Rules Committee Election and Rules Poll | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 1 | September 27th 05 10:52 PM |
| FLASH! U.S.A. Rules Committee to Address Rules Complexity? | SoarPoint | Soaring | 1 | February 3rd 04 02:36 AM |
Threaded Mode